Cricket 1882

5 6 CRICKET; A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. J u n e i, w sz. Owen (Corpus), b IVilcox ..........................9 <J. Hodgson, b Hard-V ricke ..........................12 S. Cooper (Christ’s), run H-S r a t ..................................63 L. Colbourne (Corpus), Gi­ nn o u t .......................... 3 G. P. Brownrigg Emmanuel), 1 b w, b Vilcox ..........................41 yivic^. Q ueen ’ s C ollege . J. A. Scott (Emmanuel) 1b w, b Hardwicke A. H. Richardson, cHill, b Ford.................................. W . Roach (Emmanuel), c Lowe, b Monro A. G..Patterson, b Ford .. G. Bultler, b Monro S. O. Purves, not out B 7 ,1-b 5, w 1 .. 10 Total .173 CLAPTON v. HAMPSTEAD. This match was played at Clapton on Saturday. iy 27. H. H am pstead. J. Smith, c and b iatty Wyatt, run out . Shackel c Parry, tatty .. . . . . A. Walkeri. c Mast, iatty .. . ? .. .. B. Boyd^ c Asser, tttty.......................... Batty,cFurbor,b Shackel 14 H Douglasjnot out .. 25 (AAsser, b Walker .. 15 iastfcl b w, b Shackel .. 4 3 1 b .. 11 b .. 19 b*. .. 4 S> T. Fairless, b Parry R. Furber, b Asser .. J. W. Cuthler, b Mast A. R. Parker, b Asser W. Shackel, b Batty J. Lea, not out Extras .. Total ,. 18 . 53 . 33 . 17 .213 E. Anderton, not out E xtras.................. NOTTINGHAMSHIRE v. SURREY. Imes in this match, finished at Nottingham iterday, confirmed the reputation he gained as a vler by his very fine performance against the stralians last week, and Surrey, considering that . A^ P. Lucas was away, made a very creditable fjjC* In the first innings of Notts Jones bowled £%alls for 32 runs and seven wickets (five vjled), and against such batsmen as those of Notts ygu st be accounted a great feat. Abel, the fjplayed good cricket, as did Maurice Read in xey’s first innings, and in the second Messrs. W. xvead and Shuter made most of the runs, though latter ought to have been caught not long after arrival. At the close of the second day Notts I made 36 out of 140 wanted to win for the loss ane wicket, and yesterday, after a good finish, :rey were defeated by four wickets. S urrey . First Innings. J. Shuter, b Morley en, b Shaw ... .. ris Read, not out .. W. W. Itead, b Morley .. I, b Morley . .. . \V. E. Roller, c and b Morley ;ey, c Barnes, b Shaw S. Colman, b Shaw .. ss, b Morley .. T*!^.4. „ v lson, c Barnes, b Morley 4 ratt, 1b w, b Morluy 4 B 6, 1-b 4 ..................................10 Second Innings, c Oscroft, b Flowers.. 44 b Morley ..................1 b Morley ..................0 b F lo w e rs ..................56 c and b Flowers .. .. 4 b Morley ..................6 b Wright ..................17 c and b Flowers .. .. 4 b Morley ..................8 not out...........................21 b Wright ..................0 B 2 ,1-b3 .. .. 5 T o t a l ..........................122 T otal.. ..166 N ottingham . Second Innings. b Jones ..................9 c Colman, b Abel .. 13 run out..........................48 First Innings •oft, b Jones .. 0 f l r 0 fi­ ler, c W. W. Read, b Barrah^^ 4 ies, b Jones .. *<?4rne.* .. 58 y,bJones.. V jj.. .. 21 ,ton, c Abel, b Jones 2 n, b A bel................V•‘■TW*' .. 23 •ers, b Jones ..t ? . 9 ght, st Pooley, b Barratt”^ T f^ 3 jv , c Pooler,bJones 15 win, b Jones .. . 0 ley, not out .. 0 B 5 ,1-b 2 ........................................7 Total....................................149 c and b Barratt .. .. 10 bJoues..........................49 not out...........................8 c Jones, b Barratt .. 0 not ou t..........................0 Total ..141 Jones Barratt . Johnson . Roller Abel.. . N otts . First Innings. O. M. R.W. 54.3 22 10 3 24 82 6 50 5 18 0 13 13 29 M. Read.. Second Innings. O. M. R.W. .. .. 46 26 38 2 10 48 5 16 2 11 5 21 AUSTRALIANS v. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY. In this match, finished at Cambridge yesterday, the Australians showed again in a marked degree their capacity for playing an uphill game. When they had won the toss, with such a splendid wicket as is provided at Cambridge, everyone predicted a long score, more especially as the University bowling is not very highly estimated. Their play through­ out the opening day was disappointing, and Messrs. C. T. Studd and Ramsay dismissed them all for 139, of which Bannerman and Massie contributed 87. The two bowlers equally divided the wickets at an average cost of just over 12 runs, and Wright again kept wicket well, catching Murdoch, Horan, am1 Garrett. Another fine score was made by Mr. C. T. Studd; his second innings of three figures in a first- class match within the week enabled Cambridge to have an advantage of 127 runs on the first “ hands.” ____ Total 6(. Things even later looked all in favour of the IB. Bobertson, J. F. Newsam, E. Prendergast, J. k. City,: JJniversity, when Bannerman, Murdoch, Massie, , A. D. Parry, andF. H. City did not bat. " f and M cD on n ell, fo u r o f th e fin est batsm en o n the side, were all out for 72 runs. Six wickets were then left with 55 to save the innings, but the Cambridge fielding fell off materially when Horan and Gifien got set, and at the end of the second day the Australians were 85 on, with four wickets still to fall. Yesterday, the Cantabs had to go in with 165 to win, and got them for the loss of four bats­ men, thus securing a very creditable victory—the first over the Australian team by six wickets. Second Innings, c Bather, b Ramsay .. 2 c Spencer, b C. Studd 23 b Ramsay b Ramsay A ustralians . First Innings. A. C. Bannerman, b Ramsay .. 50 H. H. Massie, c Paravicini, b C. S tu d d ..........................................37 W. L. Murdoch, c Wright, b Ramsay ..................................1 T. Horan, c Wright, b Ramsay 8 P. S. McDjnnell, c Watson, b Ramsay ..................................4 G. Giffen, c J. Studd, b C. Studd 3 S. P. Jo-.ies, c Spencer, b C. Studd 7 T. W. Garrett, c Wright, b C. S tu d d ..........................................0 G. E. Palmer,not o u t ...................12 F. R. Spofforth, c Paravicini, b Ramsay ..................................0 H. F. Boyle, c Maynard, b C. S tu d d ..........................................14 not out.................... B 1 ,1-b 1, n-b1 ..................3 B 11,1 b 3 .. b C. Studd .. candbC. Studd.. 1 b w, b Ramsay c Bather, b Ramsay .. 16 c C. Studd, b Ramsay 35 st Wright, b Ramsay 10 Total ..........................139 C ambridge U niversity First Innings. J. E. K. Studd, b Garrett .. .. 6 G. B. Studd, b Spofforth .. .. 42 E. A. Maynard, c Massie, b Palm er......................................... 6 C. W. Wright, 1b w, b Palmer .. 8 C. T. Studd, c Murdoch, b Palmerll8 not out. . 14 291 Second Innings. b Giffen ..................6(5 c Jones, b Giffen .. 48 c Spofforth, b Palmer 6 W. H. Bather, b Spofforth .. R. Spencer, b Palmer .. P. J. T. Henery, b Boyle .. P. J. De Paravicini, b Palmer R. C. Ramsay, not ou t.. J. R. Watson, b Palmer B 26,1-b 5 .................. Total. 21 . 3 . 21 . 0 . 9 . 1 . 31 .266 .. ..1 7 not out..........................15 b Giffen .................. 6 B 7 ,1-b ( Total. . 10 16„ BOWLING ANALYSIS. C ambridge . First Innings. O. R. M.W. First Innngs. j . O. M. R.W " •tf 'Wi •• 49 27 40 5 k y .r ^ r w .. 55 35 48 1 jht 9 3 16 ( rers fU>3o*Y 3 9 5 8 < BOWLING ANALYSIS. S urrey . Second Innings. Barnes 22 16 36 33 15 58 8 3 18 30 14 29 16 10 20 Palmer Garrett Spofforth .. .. 30 Boyle..................14 Giffen.....................12 Jones..................1 58.1 30 65 44 13 74 11 49 4 22 8 23 0 2 Second Innings. O. M. R.W 34 10 73 4 1 11 17 8 23 12 4 22 24 11 29 C. T. Studd Ramsay .. Watson .. Spencer.. Paravinici First Innings. O. M. R.W. 35.2 14 61 5 38 15 61 2 2 0 5 1 11 A ustralians . Second Innings. O. M. R.W . .................. 69 30 106 3 5 .......................... 71 23 118 7 0 .......................... 6 1 25 0 0 .......................... 5 1 12 0 .................. 8 1 16 0 SUSSEX v. HAMPSHIRE. Some high individual scoring marked the first match of the season between these counties, finished at Brighton yesterday. Hampshire on the first day made light of the Sussex bowling, and were not out till they had got 360. Mr. F. E. Lacey, of Caius College, Cambridge, who has been more than once tried for the University, singularly without success, again played very fine cricket for his county, scoring 157 out of 333 during his stay, and in the very best style. Mr. Lacey and Young succeeded in dismissing Sussex for 91, and when half the wickets were down in the second they still wanted 197 runs to save the innings. Then Mr. Newham and James Phillips made an extraordinary stand, and before they were parted as many as 182 runs had been added, Mr. Newham getting 101 without a mistake. Henry Phillips and Mr. Blackman saved the innings, and the match ultimately ended in a win for Hants by seven wickets after som 3 very high scoring. S ussex . First Innings. R. T. Ellis, run out ..................8 H. Phillips, b Tuck ..................14 J. Phillips, b Lacey ..................5 Mr. F. F. J. Greenfield, c Young, Second Innings, c Wood, b Lacey b Lacey .................. c Young, b Lacoy b Lacey ..................................0 C. Howard, c Wood, b Young .. 8 W. Humphreys, b Young .. Mr. W. Newham, st Wood, L a c e y .................................. Mr. W. Blackman, c Tuck, L a c e y ......................................... 7 Lillywhite, not out ..................14 J. Skinner, c Parsons, b Young.. 4 Mitchell, b Young..........................2 B7, lb 3, w 1..........................11 c Young, b Lacey c Young, b Lacey 31 15 16 b Lacey ..................9 54 h w, b Bencraft.. . .101 Total.....................................94 H ampshire . First Innings. Tuck, b Lillywhite ......................16 Young, b Blackman ........................0 G. Kay, b B lackm an .......................0 J. E. Lacey, c J. Phillips, b Humphreys....................................157 C. Calder, c H. Phillips, b Lilly- white ...............................................0 A. H. Wood, b Lillywhite .. .. 82 H. Lowe, b Lillywhite........................0 A. Bencraft, c Skinner, b Lilly- white ............................................. 56 H. P. St. John Mildmayc New­ ham, b Hum phreys......................17 Capt. Lipscombe, et. II. Phillips, b Humphreys ............................. 13 Parsons, not o u t ............................... 9 c Wood, b Lacey b Young .. run out .. not out.................. B 7,1 b 3, w 1 Total .. 51 1 10 7 11 ..402 Second Innings, c J. Phillips, b Lilly- white ..................1 notout..........................50 51 1b w, b Humphreys.. 26 B 7,1 b 2, n b 1 10 st II. Pnillips, b Lilly- white B 2,1 b 3, w 1 Total................................. 363 Total ..137 BOWLING ANALYSIS. S ussex . Young Tuck Lacoy First Innings. O. M .R.W . 32 5 13 40 1 11 13 32 First Innings. O. M. R. W. Blackman .. 39 14 71 Lillywhite .. 5820 102 Skinner.. .. 15 4 44 Humphreys .. 23.3 73 67 H ampshire . Second Innings. O. M, R. W. 13 141 1 2 2 0 23 149 7 3 44 0 0 11 0 3 24 1 3 20 0 Second Inoings. O. M. R. W. Young .. .. 56 Tuck .. .. 4 Lacey .. .. 75 Parsons.. .. 15 Mildmay .. 2 Boncroft .. 18 Kay .. 9 Greenfield .. 5 Mitchell .. 11 Newham .. .. 2 0 3 0 26 0 27 0 13 0 .1 3 5 24 0 5 .......................... 29 13 44 2 11 8 28 0 5 1 12 1 19 0 14 0 A N SW E R S TO C O R R E S P O N D E N T S . H. S anderson ,—Is a man out if in batting part of his foot is over and part within the crease or should the whole of his foot be within ? (If'any part of the foot is within the crease, he is not out.) F.R.—Can you tell me—1. The date of the publi- cation of “ Felix on the Bat,” and the price? 2. The name & address of thepublishers ? 3. Is it still in print, or should I have to get it through a second-hand bookseller ? (1, We have a copy of the third edition ; it bears the date of 1855 2. Published by Baily Brothers, Cornhill, Lonl don. 3. It is out of print, we believe, and you « would find it difficult now to get a copy.)