Cricket 1882

SEPT. 21, 1882. CRICKET; A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 303 E S S iX COUNTY. RESULTS OF MATCHES. Matches played, 7; won, 5; lost, 2; Jdiie 12, 13^—At Brentwood, v. Herts. Won by six wickcts. Essex, 123 and 51a; Herts, 77 and 95. a Four wickets down. ^aiio 10, 20.—At Ipswich, v. Suffolk Lost by 19 runs. Essex, 80 and 55; Suffolk, 70 and 85.. iiitie 20, 30.—At Brentwood, v. Bods. Wou by an innings and 131 runs. Essex, 265; Beds, 79 and 55. ^uly 3, 4.—At Brentwood, v. M.C.d. Lost by two wickets. Essex, 103 and 80; M.C.C., 53 and 132a. a Eight wickets down. Jiily 18, 1§.—At Bishop Stortford, t . Herts. Won by^ four wickets. Essex, 110 and 55a; Herts, 110 and 5i. a Six wickets down. July 21, 25.—At Brentwood, v. Suffolk. Won by 72 runs. Eisex, 145 and 134; Suffolk, 83 and 118. July 81, Aug. 1.—At Lord’s, v. M.C.C. Won by five wickots. Essex, 261 and 52 1 ; M.C.C., 194 and 118. a Five wickets down. BATTING AVERAGES. Lancashire flayed. Won. Lost. Drawn. Tot. .. .. 10 . 12 . 1 .. 3 equal 13i . 8 . 1 .. 3 „ 9* .. .. 16 . 9 . 5 .. 2 ,, 10 Middlesex .. .. .. 11 . 5 . 5 .. 1 64 Surrey .. .. 14 . 4 . 7 .. 3 „ 5> Gloucestershire .. .. 11 . 3 . 6 .. 2 ) 4 6 .. 1 „ 2V Sussex .. . .. .. 12 . 3 . 8 .. 1 „ 3V .. .. 4 .. 2 . 2 .. 0 „ 2 Derbyshire . . . . 6 .. 1 . 5 .. 0 „ 1 Somersetshire . . . . . 5 .. 1 . 4 .. 0 „ 1 Thus we have; placed as fractions: — Gloucestershire 4-11 Notts .. .. .. 19-24 Kent 5-18 Yorks .. . . . . 5-3 Sassex 7-24 Middlesex .. .. .. 1-2 Somersetshire . 1-5 Hants .. . . . . 1-2 Derbyshire.. 1-6 No. Times Most Most of not Total in an iu a Inn. out. Runs Inn. Mtoh. Aver. Barnes, W. H. P .. 11 . 4 . 191 . . 48a. 49 . . 27.2 Bagot, H. R. .. . .. 11 . 2 . 193 . . 76 . 86 . 22 6 . . 6 . 6 . 2 Bastard, S. R. .. . .. 3 . 0 . 0 . . 0 . 0 . . 0 Baines, W. N. .. . .. 4 . 0 . 55 . . 21 . 42 . 14 Du Cane, J. P. .. . .. 3 . 1 . 6 . 6 . 6 . . 3 Fortescue, Rev... . .. 4 . 0 . 174 . . 89 . 89 . . 43.2 Francis, W................. .. 5 . 1 . 14 . 10a. 11 . . 3.2 Green, C. E ................ .. 3 . o . 95 . . 48 . 43 . . 31.2 Grimatone, W. E. . .. 5 .. 0 . 34 . 17 . 27 . . 6.4 Pickett........................ .. 8 .. 2 . 22 . 11 . . 11 . . 8.4 Palmer, E. C. .. . .. 4 . 1 . 45 . . 21a. 38 . . 15 Ridley, C. E. . . . .. 3 . 1 . 9 . . 8 . 8 . . 4.1 Roberts ................ . .. 6 . 0 . 91 . 33 . 35 . . 15.1 Roberts, W. H. .. . .. 3 . 0 . 33 . 21 . 24 . . 11 Silcock, F ................ ..1 3 . 0 . 110 . 29 . 3) . . 8.6 Silcook, J.................... Womersley, D .. . .. 3 . 0 . 20 . 12 . . 18 . 6.2 .. 5 .. 0 . 63 . 25 . 25 . . 12 Reducing all the^o fractions to a common denominator (665,280 being L.C.M.), we have the following table by which wo may compare the respective counties in 1892:— Lancashire .. .. 561,380 Notts .................. 526,680 Yorks..........................415,800 Middlesex ) m o#in Hants f •* ** Surrey .................. 261,360 Gloucestershire .. 241,920 Kent..........................181,830 Sussex .................. 145,530 Somersetshire .. 133,056 Derbyshire .. .. 110,880 HAMPSTEAD C.C. SUMMARY OF RESULTS. Matches played, 41; won, 15; lost, 14; drawn, 12, BATTING AVERAGES. a Signifies not out. Played in two innings:—Handley, 0 and 8; R. L. Allport, 27 and 5; C. Hitchcock, 15 and 10; Smith, 10 a n d l; E. Read, 2 and 12; J. J. Read, 30 and 7; C. H. Thompson, 4 and 5 ; W. Gouldstone, 3 and 1; H. F. Hills, 0 (notout) and 0; R. Spenoer, 2 and 11; W. Seabrook, 2 and 8; W. Webster, 1 aud 17; C. G. Morewether, 4 and 5 ; E. P. Barnes, 0 and 6 (not out); E. P. Copland, 14 (not out) andO (not out). Played one innings:—H. G. Owen, 31; C. Masterman, 0 ; H H. T wells, 0 ; J. Blow, 1. BOWLING AVERAGES. Bruen, H. .. Pickett.. .. Silcock, F. .. Silcock, Joe Webster, W. Inn. .. 4 .. 12 .. 12 .. 2 Overs. Mdns. Runs. Wktrf. . 84 . , 335 , 340 . , 19 . 57 18 . 135 . 154 . 6 . 143 .. 466 .. 409 .. 80 .. 100 Aver. 7.17 18.8 12.1 5 9.1 Bowlod in one innings:—H. R. Bagot, 1 wicket for 13 ruus ; W. M. Baines, 1 wicket for 29 runs; and J. Blow, 2 wickets for 27 runs. Average Runs Wickets per Wkt. County. scored. taken. lost. Hants .................................. 1,360 . .. . 63 ... . 21.5 (N o t t s ................................. 3,198 . .. . 171 . .. . 18.7 |M iddlesex..........................3,199 ... . 171 . .. . 18.7 Lancashire .......................... 4,338 . . . . 245 ----- 17.6 Kent......................................... 2,726 ... . 160 ... . 17.0 Sussex ................................. 8,702 . .. . 225 . .. . 16.5 Yorks ................................. 4,196 . .. . 253 ... . 16.4 Surrey ................................. 4,050 . .. . 247 ... . 16.3 Gloucester .......................... 8,057 . .. . 191 ----- 16 Derby ................................. 1,472 . .. . 110 ... . 13.3 Somerset.................................. 1,139 . .. . 95 ... . 12.1 Runs Opponents’ Average, scored by Wickets per Wkt Counties. Opponents. taken. taken. Lancashire .......................... 8,255 . . . . 804 . .. . 10.7 Notts .................................. 8,043 . . . . 222 . .. . 13.7 Yorks ................................. 4,236 . .. . 307 . .. . 13.8 Gloucester .......................... 2,642 . .. . 165 . .. . 16.0 Middlesex .......................... 3,473 . .. . 188 . .. . 18.4 8urrey .................................. 4,435 . .. . 216 . .. . 20.5 Kent .................................. 2,993 . .. . 150 ... . 19.9 Hants .................................. 1,380 . .. . 6*5 ... . 21.2 Derby ..................................1,813 . . . . 85 ... . 21.2 Somerset.................................. 1,474 . . . . 61 . .. . 24.1 Sussex .................................. 4,035 . .. . 168 ... . 25.2 As the above results aro given in decimals, it will bo seen, by subtracting the latter from the former table, that Lancashire comes first with a balance of + 69 per average innings, (2) Notts + 50, (8) Yorks -f 26, (4) Hants and Middlesex equal -f 8, (6) Gloucester 0, (7) Kent — 29, (8) Surrey — 42, (9) Derby — 80, (10) Sussex — 87, and (11) Somerset — 120. The following result, which is remarkable for its similarity, may be obtained by a totally different mode of calculation. Counting eaoh -win equal to one, and each draw equal to a half, we have from the following table:— Inns* Times not out. Most in Inns. Runs. Avge# Butcher, A. . . . 16 .. 3 .. 76 . 470 . 86.2* 7 .. 0 .. 78 . 249 . 35.4 Carey, S. W. S ... . 13 .. 0 .. 101 . 314 . 21.2 Loach, A. J. .. . 31 .. 2 .. 100 . . 655 . 22.17 26 .. 4 .. 71 . 455 . 20.16 Walker, J. II. .. . 23 .. 2 .. 82a . . 466 . . 20.6 Dinham, J. W. .. . . 8 .. 1 .. 50 . . 130 . . 18.4 .. 0 .. 56 . . 267 . . 16.11 Flemming, R. .. . . 12 .. 1 .. 54 . 181 . . 16.10 Charlton, E. W. 6 .. 0 .. 43 . . 100 . . 16.4 Parker, A. R. 10 .. 3 .. 65a . . 248 . . 15.8 Holt, A....................... 13 .. 0 . 50 . 195 . . 15 Shackel, W. . . . . 10 .. 0 .. 53 . 149 . . 14.9 Doll, C. F................... 12 .. 3 . 58a . 133 . . 14.7 Carsy, E. E. 9 .. 1 . 38 . 114 . . 14.2 Phillips, H. B. .. . 5 .. 1 .. 25 . . 54 . . 13.2 Walker, R. A. .. . 20 .. 1 .. 38 . 248 . . 13.1 Marshall, W. R. . 10 .. 0 . 60 . 128 . . 12.8 Cutler, J. W. . 18 .. 0 . 58 . 224 . 12.8 .. 3 . 39 . 137 . 12.5 Shackel, H. .. . . 11 .. 0 . 54 . 165 . 11.11 Fairless, S. D. .. . 15 .. 2 . 34 . 153 . 11.10 Hill, R. W. D. .. . . 17 .. 2 . 44a . 157 . 10.7 Parker, H. S. .. . 5 .. 1 . 24 . 41 . 10.1 Boyd, A. B. P. .. . . 14 .. 1 . 81 . 131 . 10.1 .. 0 . 47 . 160 . 10 Smith, H. T. . 18 .. 8 . 25 . 131 . 8.11 Creaton, G. W ... 5 .. 0 . 29 . 41 . 8.1 Doyle, F. A. K ... . 12 .. 0 . 16 . 78 . 6.6 Creaton, R............ . 6 .. 1 . 22 . 33 . 6.3 Wyatt, A.............. . 12 .. 8 . 9 . 50 5.5 Bradley, A. M. . 8 .. 1 . 13a . 37 . 5.2 Durlacher, Godfrey . 9 .. 8 . 9 . 28 4.4 Durlacher, George . 9 .. 2 . 21a . 82 . 4.4 George, S. K. . 6 .. 1 .. 11a a Signifies not out. . 21 . 4.1 BICKLEY PARK. SUMMARY OF MATCHES. Won, 9 ; tied, 1; drawn, 4; lost, 5; RESULTS OF MATCHES. May 6.—At Bickley, v. Esher. Bickley Park, 137; Esher, 145 for 9 wickets. May 13.—At Beckenham, v. Beckenham. Bickley Park, 343 for 7 wickets ; Beckenham, 59- May 20.—At Bickley, v. Oaklands. Bickley Park, 165; Oaklands, 84, and 113 for 6 wickets. May 27.—At Sittingbourne, v. Gore Court. Bickley Park, 140 Gore Court, 113, and 47 for 3 wickets. June 3.—At Bickley, v. Upper Tooting. Bickley Park, 166; Upper Tooting, 247 for 8 wickets. June 10.—At Bickley, v. Incogniti. Bickley Par’c, 423 for 3 wickets; Incogniti did not bat. June 17.—At Bickley, v. Farningham. Bickley Park, 244; Far­ ningham, 109, aad 11 for 1 wicket. June 24.—At Bickley, v. Blackheath Morden. Bickley Park, 416; Blackheath, 69 for 7 wickets. July 1.—At Bickley, v. Gore Court. Bickley Park, 190; Gore Court, 221. July 8.—At Bickley, v. Beckeuham. Bickley Park, 193; Becken­ ham, 151. July 15.—At Bexley, v. Bexley. Bickley Park, 102 for 5 wickets ; Bexley, 127. July 22.—At Bickley, v. Bexley. Bickley Park, 166; Bexley, 67, and 71 for 8 wickets. July 26.—At Bickley, v. a Clifton Eleven. Biekley Park, 157 ; Clifton, 157, and 81 for 5 wickets. July 29.—At Farningham. Bickley Park, 163, and 103 for 1 wicket; Famingham, 115. August 5.—At Plaistow, v. Plaisfeow. Bickley Park, 109, and 63 for 3 wickets; Plaistow, 81. August 7.—At Bickley, v. Ravenscourt Park. Bickley Park, 88; Ravenscourt Park, 107, and 229 for 7 wickets. August 16.—At Tooting, v. Upper Tooting. Bickley Park, 107, and 52 for 7 wickets; Upper Tooting, 182. August 21 and 22.—At Chichester, v. Priory Park. Bicklcy Park, 248; Priory Park, 295, and 65 for 3 wickets. August 26.—At Bickley, v. Plaistow. Bickley Park, 259; Plais­ tow, 69, and 27 for no wicket. The club made 4,048 runs for 186 wickets, against their oppo­ nents’ 3,048 ruus for 200 wickets. BATTING AVERAGES. Jones, R. S. Horne, T. W. .. M'Kewan, A. C ... Patterson, W. II. Sanderson, W. .. M‘Kewan, E. F. Rashleigh, W. W. Pattisson, W. B. Barlow, E. P. Spreckley, W. H. Cooper, C. J. H. Grimsdale, T. B. Boosey, C. T. White, A. T. O ... Jones, J. A. S. Betts, M. P. Vigne, J. H. Tuke, C. M. Hubbard, W. P. The following are the averages of members who played in more than ono but less than five in n in g s J . Lea, 23; W. Howard, 18, 2; J. H. Moore, 16, 1; A. C. Robertson, 13, 3; E. B. Holmes, 13, 2; E. Townend, 10, 1; R. Greenland, 9; E. Swift, 9; C. Barton, 7 ; G. Riley, 6. 1; A. Reid, 5, 2; A. Lam­ port, 4 ,1; E. O. Hazell, 4; F. S. Alford, 8, 3; C. Nash, 8; L. E. Routledge, 2, 2; C. Ash, 2 ,1 ; W. Burchett, 1, 1. BOWLING AVERAGES. Barlow, H. S. Parker, A. R ... Flemming, R. Marshall, W. R. Butcher, A, .. Walker, J.H ... Overs. , 56 , 307 66 61 , 255 327 Leach, A. J..............344 Parker, H. S............ 27 Carey, S. W. S. .. 43 Shackel, H...............103 Fairless, S. D. .. 185 Hill, R. W. D. 78 Holt, A ,.................. 149 Holt, M.................... 62 Walker, R. A............ 118 Creaton, G. W. .. 76 Dollar, P.................. 55 Smith, H. T............ 24 Wides: A. J. Leach, 8; Shackel, 2 ; R. W. D. H ill,! No Balls: A. R. Parker, R. A. Walker, 1. Runs. 94 586 115 177 557 710 687 83 102 238 298 202 853 108 272 214 149 104 A. Holt, 4; H. I ; R. A. Walker, 1 7; A. Butcher, 1; Maidens. . 22 .. . 101 .. . 19 .. . 10 .. . 60 .. . 75 .. . 92 .. 5 .. 6 .. . 27 .. . 34 .. . 19 .. . 42 .. . 21 .. . 20 .. 18 .. . 11 .. 4 .. Wickets. .. 14 .. .. 75 .. .. 12 .. .. 16 .. .. 48 .. .. 57 .. .. 43 .. .. 5 .. .. 6 .. .. 12 .. .. 15 .. .. 9 .. .. 14 .. .. 4 ., .. 8 ., .. 6 .. .. 4 ., Avgo 6.1. 7.60 9.71 11.1 11.29 12.26 15.42 16.3 17 19.10 19.13 22.4 25.3 27 84 85.4 87.1 52 S. Parker, 2; H, ; P. Dollar, 1. S. W. S. Carey, 1 Times Most Inns. not out. in Inus. Runs. Avge, 8 .. 1 .. 116a .. 191 .., 95.1 5 .. 4 .. 31a .. 81 . . 84 3 .. 2 .. 36a .. 74 . . 74 5 .. 2 . 129a . . 216 . . 72 3 .. 0 . . 78 .,. 140 . . 46.2 4 .. 2 ... 45a . . as . . 44 5 .. 3 .,. 49a . . 66 . . 33 8 .. 0 . . 87 .,. 257 . . 32.1 11 .. 0 ... 128 .,. 320 . . 29.1 10 .. 0 . . 78 .,. 285 . . 28.5 4 .. 0 . . 56 ... 113 . . 28.1 7 .. 0 .. 93 .. 160 . . 22.6 8 .. 0 . . 79 . . 170 . . 21.2 9 1 . 8> . . 167 . . 20.7 4 ... 0 . . 49 . . 81 . . 20.1 . 11 .. 1 . . 64 . . 190 . . 19 10 .. 1 . &9a . . 104 . . 11.5 9 .. 2 . . 19a . . 80 . . 11.3 3 .. 0 . . 15 . . 31 . . 10.1 5 .. 0 . . 22 . . 49 . . 9.4 4 . . 0 . . 20 . . 37 . . 9.1 , 10 .. 1 . . 29 . . 78 . . 8.6 , 4 .. 0 . . 28 . . 82 . . 8 8 .. 1 . . 15a . . 88 . . 5.3 . 5 .. 1 . 7 . 22 . • 5.2 7 .. 2 . . 11 . . 24 4.1 . 7 .. 0 . . 21 . . 30 . . 4.2 7 .. 0 . . 14 . . 25 . . 8.5 Latter, B. H. Alston, J. H. Latter, A. H. Willett, A. E. .. Parr, Rev. W. C. The following played in two innings:—F. E. Street, 133 runs, 129a and 4; T. C. Hooman, 76; C. M. Baker, 29 ; A. S. Gedge, 20 ; C. H. Biggs, 15; C. W. Mills, 14; W. Thomas, 9. The following played in only one innings:—H. D. Blyth, 64 ; A. Hill, 46a; Rev. R. G. Hodgson, 31; A. Bouch, 19; W. II. Hadow, 17; J. Gibson, 16; W. Frome-Young, 10; F. G. Par- bury, 6; G. E. Cotton, 3; and C. A. Edwards, 3. a Signifies not out. BOWLING AVERAGES. Hodgson, Rev. R. G. Willett, A. E ... Vigne, J.H . .. White, A. T. O. Latter, A. H Cooper, C. J. H. Jones, J. A. S. Tuke, C. M. .. Boosey, C. T ... , Hubbard, W . P. Rashleigh, W. W. Home, T. W ... Patterson, W. H. Sanderson, W. Pattisson, W. B. Hilder, R. Grimsdale, T. B. Boosey, A. Barlow, E. P ... The following took two wickets:—C. W. Mills, 26 runs; C. C. Parr, 82 runs; E. Latter, 44 runs. The following took one wicket:—A. Bouch, 4 runs; E. F. M‘Kewan, 15 runs; C. A. Edwards, 81 runs ; C. H. W. Bigs 28 runs; C. M. Baker, 38 runs; Rcy. W. C. Pavr, 76 ruus; \\* H. Hadow, 84 runs. Overs. Maidcus. Runs. Wickets. Avgo. . 13 .. 5 .. 17 .. 6 .. 2.5 29.3 .. 13 .. 51 .. 8 .. 6.3 43.4 .. 14 ... 108 .. 12 .. 9 14 .. 3 .. 39 .. 4 .. 9.3 112 .. 35 , 209 .. 21 .. 9.20 54 .. 23 .,. 51 •. 5 .. 10.1 179 .. 54 .,, 392 .. 34 .. 11.18 56.1 .. 16 .,. 96 .. 8 .. 12 133.2 .. 38 .. 274 .. 20 .. 13.14 14 .. 4 ... 42 .. 3 .. 14 31 .. 10 , 128 .. 9 .. 14.2 16.2 .. 0 . . 44 .. 3 .. 14.2 58.4 .. 14 .,. 129 .. 8 .. 16.1 32 .. 8 . . 102 .. 6 .. 17 , 87 .. 11 130 .. 7 .. 18.4 37.2 .. 9 . . 80 4 .., 20 44 .. 11 . . 185 .. 6 .. 22.2 81.2 .. 23 . 209 .. 8 .. 25.1 41 .. 9 . . 105 .. 3 .. 85