Cricket 1882
3 0 2 CRICKET; A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. s e p t. 21 , 1882 . M r . T. A . M acau lay ’ s E l e v e n . H. Foster, b J. M ore.. .. 8 { F. F. Austin, not out .. .. 13 T. T. Macaulay, b Brady .. 1 J C. M. Buttanshaw, c Worters, H, b M o r e .........................0 1 G. Logan, b Wetherall .. 5 C. Buttanshaw, b Brady.. 0 I F. Buttanshaw', c Wether all, b More .................4 1 In the second innings H. Foster Buttanshaw (b Marshall) 0, C. Bntf Buttanshaw (not out) 0, F. Loveday Loveday, b Brady A. Macaulay, b Brady Richardson, absent .. . Richardson, absent .. Extras.......................... Total o^red (b C. Marshall) 6, M. aashaw (b Marshall) 6, F. (b Marshall) 0 ; total, 12. AUSTRALIANS v. SHAW’S ELEVEN. Yesterday the Australians brought to a close the last of their metropolitan matches at the Oval. On no previous occasion on the Surrey ground dur ing the present tour had they been favoured with fine weather throughout the whole course of the game, and their last appearance found them in no better luck. Incessant rain pre vented any play on the seeond day, and this was the more to be regretted as there was every likeli hood that the game would be interesting. Shaw’s Eleven, with the exception of Shrewsbury, whose place was taken by Gunn, was the same as played throughout the greater part of the Australian tour. On the colonial side Palmer was still too lame to take part in the game, and Jones was again left out, so that the eleven was the same as won the previous match against Shaw’s team at Leeds. An experi ment was tried in this contest by the Sur rey Club. With a view to test the centre of the usual pitch for important matches, the wickets were placed across the ground, i.e., at right angles to their usual positions. Shaw won the toss, and of course took the innings. At the outset, though it played well, the ground was a little slow, and the scoring was by no means high. The batting of the English team presented no very noteworthy features. Gunn played with unusual care, and Bates hit freely. The best as well as the highest innings on the side was that of Emmett, and his 27 were thoroughly well got. The Aus tralians had a bad light to bat in on Monday night, but making allowance even for this, their play was much below their best form. Massie was bowled by what appeared to be a half volley the first ball of the innings. The rest were fairly puzzled by the excellent bowling of Peate, who, though very lame, h&s rarely kept a better length. Murdoch made 14, but he ought to have been stumped once before he was out. Giffen’s 16 was a very fair display, but otherwise the form was decidedly moderate, and when play ceased seven wickets were down for 38. Incessant rain prevented the delivery of a ball on Tuesday, and yesterday the game was continued under anything but favourable conditions. During the early part of the day the light was very bad, and a drizzling rain occasionally added to the general discomfort. The cricket, too, was hardly as eventful as it might have been. Thanks chiefly to Bonnor, the follow-on was saved, but after luncheon, as there was no chance of the game being played out, most of the interest was gone. Mur doch took the opportunity of trying several of his ordinary change bowlers, and, as will be seen, McDonnell, Bannerman, and he each got a wicket. Barlow hit two fours from successive balls of Garrett, and altogether his 50 was a little more lively than is his usual habit. Scotton, too, played good cricket for his 49 not out. The match was .Ivotni Rliaw’s P.lAVpn 'hpinf? 232 on with fnnr drawn, Sh ’ E eve be g wickets to fall. Score and analyses :— S h a w ’ s E le v e n . First Innings Barlow, b B o y le ..........................7 Ulyett, c Horan, b Spofforth .. 8 Midwinter, b Spofforth .. .. 5 G unn, b Spofforth..........................21 Bates, c Murdoch, b Spofforth .. 26 Scotton, c Bonnor, b Spofforth.. 12 Selby, b Boyle..................................8 Emmett, c Bannerman, b Gar rett ..........................................-7 not out Shaw, b Spofforth..........................4 Pilling, not out ..........................11 Peate, c and b B o y le ..................0 B 8 ,1-b 2 ..................................5 B l Second Innings, b McDonnell .. .. C6 b Spofforth.................. 7 c Garrett, b Banner man ..........................25 runout.......................... c Garrett, b Murdoch 18 not out..........................49 c Murdoch, b Boyle .. 19 Total. .129 H. H. Massie, b Midwinter 0 A. C. Bannerman, c Bar- low, b P e a to ..................2 W. L. Murdoch, st Pilling, b P e a t e ..........................14 P. S. McDonnell,b Peate.. 0 T. Horan, st Pilling, b Peate..................................8 G. Giffen, b Peale .. .. 16 J. M’C. Blackham, c Selbv, b U ly ett.................. .*. 0 G. J. Bonnor, c Emmett, b P r a te ......................98 H. F. Boyle, b Barlow .. 1 T. W. Garrett, c Peate, b B a rlo w ..........................11 F. R. Spofforth, not out.. 8 B 4 ......................4 Total 87 BOWLING ANALYSES. Spofforth Boyle . Garrett ., S h aw ’ s E le v e n . First Innings. 0. M. R.W. 45 25 57 6 ................ 88.1 17 48 8 ................ 11 2 19 Sccond Innings. O. M. R.W. .. 19 Midwinter Peate .. Bannerman McDcnnell Murdoch A u stralian s . O. M. R.W. 18 9 14 1 | Ulyett .. 28 12 48 6 | Barlow .. 7 31 7 85 11 28 9 36 1 19 O. M. R.W. 5 1 12 1 10.8 4 14 2 S eptem ber 14, at St. Mark’s, Surbiton, Reginald, son of J. Howell, Esq., Rutland House, Surbiton, to Mary, daughter of Captain Sir G. S. Nares, R.N., K.C.B., St. Philip’s-road, Surbiton. S eptem ber 14, at the Parish Church of East Knoyle, Wilts, the Rev. C. C.Mackarness, Chaplain to the Bishop of Oxford, to Grace Emily Milford, daughter of the Rev. R. N. Milford, Rector of East Knoyle and Rural Dean. C b ic k e t in I r elan d . —John Lawrence’s Hand book of Cricket in Ireland. Double number, 16-17, 1880-81, Post Is. 6d., per post, Is. 8d. Now ready, contains list of Cricket and Football Clubs in Ireland, with names and addresses of Hon. Sec., and History of Cricket in Ireland in 1880-1881. Published by John Lawrence, Cricket and Lawn Tennis Outfitter, 63, Grafton-street, Dublin.— [A d v t .] C r ic k e t . —A song, written and composed by J. H. Smith, and dedicated to A. N. Hornby, Esq. “ It will be welcomed heartily by all lovers of the manly and truly national British gni:e.”— Era. Post free, 18 stamps, of the author, 22, Clifton- street, Wolverhampton.— [A d v t .] CO U N T Y C R IC K E T IN 1882. NORFOLK. The Norfolk eleven during 1882 has played ten matches, of which they won four (viz., Hertford shire, Suffolk, Players of England, and M.C.C. and Ground, at Norwich), lost three (Bedfordshire, M.C.C. and Ground at Lord’s, and Leicestershire), and three have been drawn (Hertfordshire return, Free Foresters, and Bedfordshire return). Their best performance was the easy victory over an Eleven of England, including Shaw, Shrewsbury. Robinson, Nash, Platts, L. M. Day, and W. W. Pullen. BATTING AVEKAGES. Jarvis, L. K. . Jarvis, C. J. E. Wickham, Rev. A. P. Birkbeck, H............. Currie, Capt. F. A ... Gurney, W. S .. .. R y e .......................... Tillard, C. .. .. Clarke, E. W. R. .. Kemp, Sir K .. .. Morton, P. H............ Davies, Rev. A C .. Luddington, H. T .. Fellowes, E. N. Skerrett, C. P .. Jarvis, A. W ............. Elwes, G. P............... Kennawoy, Rev. C. L. Marshall, L. P. No. Times Total Most Most of not No. of in an in a Ave Inn. out Runs. Inn. Match. rt ge. .. 15 .. 2 . 466 . 75a . 125 . . 85.8 .. 15 .. 1 . 858 . 72 . 86 . . 25.5 .. 14 .. 8 . 159 . 77 . 77 . . 14.4 .. 14 .. 0 . 196 . 53 . 78 . . 14.0 .. 11 .. 0 . 186 . 63 . 63 . . 16.9 .. 0 . 162 . . 71 . . 71 . 14.7 .. 11 .. 5 . 36 . 19 a . 19 . . 6.0 .. 9 .. 0 . 112 . 88 . 49 . . 12.4 .. 7 . 1 . 87 . 81a . 42 . . 14.5 .. 6 .. 1 . 78 . 34 . 84 . . 14.6 .. 6 .. 0 . 58 . 20 . 86 . . 9.6 .. 5 .. 0 . 77 . 88 . 52 . . 15.4 .. 5 .. 8 . 20 . 7 . 11 . 10 .. 4 .. 1 . 69 . 89 . 44 . 23 .. 4 .. 0 . 16 . 10 . 10 . 4 .. 4 .. 0 . 8 . . 5 . . 8 . 2 .. 4 .. 0 . 6 . 8 . 8 . 1.5 .. 8 .. 0 . 202 .147 . 147 . . 67.8 .. 8 .. 0 . 8 .. 2 . 3 . 1 a Signifies not out. .a Played in two innings :—Rev. A. G. Blyth 73, .T. H. M. Hare >5, E. B. Raikes 21, Rev. W. B. Weighell 9, J. Jackson 9, Rev. H. Turner 5, Harbour 2, E. J. Johnson 0. Played in one innings :—C. P. Wilson 29, W. A. Thurgar 29, Hon. J. Mansfield 2. BOWLING AVERAGES. Inn. .. 12 Overs. Mdns. Ruus. Wkts. Aver. 401 .. 176 .. 563 .. 85 .. 16.2 Tillard, C.............. .. 10 . . 328 . 153 . . 511 . . 28 . . 18.25 Jarvis, C. J .. .. .. 13 . . 218 . 74 . . 396 . . 28 . . 17.22 Morton, P. H. .. 8 . . 189 . 85 . 288 . . 33 . . 8.73 Raikes, E. B. Luddington, H. T. . 3 . 139 . 45 . 231 . . 8 . . 28.87 . 5 . . 103 . 82 . . 211 . . 13 . . 16.2f> 24.63 Weighell, Rev. .. . 2 . 42 . 16 . 74 . 8 . Turner, Rev. H .. 2 . 87 . 19 . . 44 . . 1 . . 44 Wilson, C. P. ’. 2 ’. . 80 . 14 . . 83 . . 8 . . 4.12 Davies, Rev. A. C. . 4 . 2) . 10 . . 29 . . 2 . . 14.50 The following bowled less titan 20 overs :—Harbour, 15 overs for 18 runs; W. S. Gurney, 14 for 34 ; Capt. Currie, 12 for 22 • L, K. Jarvis, 9 for 21; J. H. Hare, 7 for 15 ; J. Jackson, 5 for 13; W. A. Thurgar, 4 for 9 ;E. S. Johnson, 8 for 6 ; E. W. Clarke, 2 for 10. SOMERSETSHIRE. RESULTS OF MATCHES. Matches played, 8; won, 1; drawn, 1; lost, 6. Juno 8 and 9.—At Manchester, v. Lauclishire. Lost by an innings and 157 runs. Lancashire, 237; Somerset, 29 and 51. July 13 and 14.—At Gloucester, v. Gloucestershire. Lost hy an innings and 177 runs. Gloucestershire, 848 ; Somer set, 62 and 109. July 22 and 25.—At Southampton, v. Hants. Lost by 10 wickets. Hants, 147 and 74a; Somerset, 101 and 118. a No wicket down. August 4 and 5.—At Lord’s, v. M.C.C. Lost by 1 wicket. M.C.C., 109 and 246a; Somerset, 131 and 219. a Nine wickets down. August 8, 9, and 10.—At Taunton, v. Hants. Won by 5 wickets. Hants, 146 and 29J; Somerset, 214 and 224a. a Five wickets dowu. Avgust 11 and 12.—At Taunton, v. M.C.C. Drawn. M.C.C., 506; Somerset, 286 and 163a. a Five wickets down. August 14 and 15.—At Taunton, v. Lancashire. Lost by 9 wickets. Lancashire, 178 and 54a; Somerset, 74 and 157. a One wicket down. August 21 and 22.—At Taunton, v. Australians. Lost by an innings aud 19 runs. Australians, 245; Somerset 96 and 130. BATTING AVERAGES. Not Most Most Inn?, out. Runs. inns, match. Av’ge. Terry, F. W. .. .. 4 .. 1 .. 107 .. 77a.. 99 .. 85.2 Newton, S. C........... 10 .. 1 .. 310 .. 80 .. 124 .. 34.4 Fowler, W. H............ 16 .. 0 .. 362 .. 189 .. 189 .. 22.10 Ramsay, R. C. .. 8 .. 1 .. 145 .. 71 .. 90 .. f 0.5 Roe, R. N.................. 8 .. 0 .. 158 .. 45 .. 55 .. 19.6 Sainsbury, E ............ 16 .. 1 .. 255 .. 68 .. 79 .. 17.0 Welman, F. T. .. 10 .. 2 .. 108 .. 86 .. 41 .. 12.7 Sweet, C. F............... 7 . . S . . 4 1 .. 19«.. 1 9 .. 10.1 Fothergill.................. 15 .. 2 .. 120 .. 29 .. 29 .. 9 8 Evans, A. H............. 4 .. 0 .. 37 .. 21 .. 21 .. 9.1 Winter, C.................10 .. 2 .. 71 .. 28a.. 28 .. 8.7 Fox, H. F................. 8 .. 0 .. 58 .. 81 .. 35 .. 6.5 Reed, F...................... 10 .. 0 .. 64 .. 42 .. 44 .. 6.4 Tate, W ..................... 4 .. 0 .. 19 .. 19 .. 19 .. 4.3 Scott.......................... 4 .. 1 .. 12 .. 6 .. 10 .. 8.0 Fox, H....................... 6 .. 0 .. 16 .. 6 .. 8 .. 2.4 Trask,W ... .. .. 6 .. 1 .. 1 0 .. 7a.. 9 . . 1.4 a Signifies not out. The following played in two innings only F. J. Potbuiv end 0, E. H. Hall 0 and (not out) 0, D. D. Pontifex 2 and 18, H. N. Massey 2 and 4, R .E . Hill 0 and (not out) 7, F. J. Hill 29 and 2, H. F. Reed 0 and 18, C. E. Greenway 18 and 1, H. Hild- yaid 1 and (not out) 59, F. W. Hotliam 8 and 7. Played in only one innings: E. Western 0, W. W. Cookson 8. BOWLING AVERAGES. Inns. Overs. Mdns. Ruus. Wkts. Aver. Fowler, W. H. .. 8 .. 86 .. 29 .. If5 .. 12 .. 13.9 Winter, C................. 10 .. 97.2 .. 27 .. 219 .. 14 .. 14.18 Evans, G. H............. 3 .. 80.2 .. 19 .. 202 .. 10 .. 20.2 Fothergill .. .. 12 .. 871.1 .. 118 .. 5f8 .. ‘.6 .. 21.12 Trask, W ................... 4.. 46 .. 11 .. 88 .. 8 .. 29.1 Ramsay, R. C. .. 5 .. 145 .. 46 .. 287 .. 9 .. 81.8 Sainsbury, E ............ 8 .. 55 .. 9 .. 161 .. 4 .. 40.1 Reed, Rev. F. .. 10 .. 167 .. 58 .. 813 .. 7 .. 44.5 Newton, S. C........... 4 .. 13 .. 2 .. 53 .. 0 .. — The following bowled in two innings only:—Scott, 71 overs, 29 maidens, 99 runs, 2 wickets; R. N. Roe, 48.1 overs, 14 maidens, 92 runs, 4 wickets. Bowled in one innings:—E. H. Hall, 27 overs, 9 maidens, 47 runs, 1 wicket; H. F. Reed, 2 overs, 1 maiden, 1 run, 0 wicket; W. Tate, 10 overs, 2 maiden?, 27 runs, 0 wicket; R. E. Hill, 8 overs, 1 maiden, 21 runs, 1 wicket; H. Hildyard, 8 overs, 0 maiden, 10 runs, 0 wicket. Fotheigill bowled 8 no balls ; Ramsay, 1 wide ard 1 no ball; Messrs. F. Heed, Sainsbury, and R. E. Hill 1 no I all each.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDg4Mzg=