Cricket 1882

290 CEICKET; A WEEKLY RECOKD OF THE GAME. SEPT, 14, 1882. TRAFALGAR v. STAR (PECKHAM RYE). Played at Blacklieatli on September 9. S t a r . Girdlestone, b Denniss .. 8 Holford, 1 bw , b Denniss 4 White, b Stedman .. .. 2 E. Langworthy, obstruct­ ing field..........................0 J. Lan"worthy, b Stedman 10 Bartlett, c Nettleton, b Stedman..........................7 Barton, b Denniss ., .. 1 T ra fa lg a r , Butler, b Djnniss .. .. 1 E. J. Pearce, st Denniss, b Stedman..........................8 Sims, not o u t ..................2 Davis, b Dennis..................0 B 8, 1-b 1 ..................9 Total J. J. Stedman, b Holford 24 C. Nettleton, b Lang­ worthy ..........................0 J C. Gregory, c and b Barton ..........................69 W. C. Adams, not out .. 20 A. Pottinger, not out .. 0 B 14,1-b 2, w 2 .. .. 18 Total..................181 T. Pottinger, G. Pottinger, G. Draper, H.*W. Humphreys, H Sheaf, and W. J. Denniss did not bat. WEST CHISLEHURST v. MOTTINGHAM. Played at Chislehurst on September 9. C h isle h u r st . First Inniugs. Second Innings. H. B. Kane, c Phillips, b Macers 45 n o t o u t . , .................. 11 G. James, b Macers .................... 6 W. Cooper, c and b Phillips .. 8 b White ...................0 J. C. Adams, b Phillips .. .. 4 st Cranham...................1 H. Libby, c and b Eccot .. .. 2 c Macers, b Phillips.. 5 Hatch, b Eccot ............................0 b White ...................4 J. Libby, c Cranham, b Phillips 19 b P h illip s ...................0 J. Hill, b Phillips............................2 G. Hunt, c Crow, b E ccot.. .. 0 Batting, b E c c o t ............................8 pt Cranham...................8 J. Potter, not out............................1 c Cranham...................0 Extras ....................................4 Total. ................99 M o ttin q h am . Total J. Phillips, b Libby ., .. 12 C. Macers, run out .. .. 18 Eccot, b H atch ..................6 W. Haywood, b Libby .. 8 L. Cranham, b Libby .. 14 W. Phillips, c Kane, b Cooper .......................... 3 Allen, b Cooper..................0 T. Amos, c Hill, b Cooper B. J. White, b Libby Crow, not out .. A. N. Other, b Cooper Extras .. Total SHAKESPEARE v. TILBURY AND SOUTHEND. Played at Pond Lane, Clapton, on August 13 S h a k e sp e a r e . J. G. Walne, b H ale.. .. 1 E. E. Logsdon, c Hale, b Copley ..........................85 T. H. Bodger, b Putman.. 6 J. Beale, b Hale..................16 F. W. Harper, c Putman, b G re e n .......................... 8 W. Montgomery, b H ale.. 0 A. W. Eedes, c Clare, b Green ..........................18 G. Snapes, b Hale .. .. 15 H. Barr, c Putman, b Green .......................... 1 T. Booth, not out .. .. 6 H. Ilose, c Hale, b Clare.. 0 B 14,1-b4, w 2, nb 1.. 21 Total .127 Putman, b Eedes .. * . 5 Hale, b E e d e s ..................1 Copley, c and b Eedes .. 0 Green, b B a n : ..................0 Barnard, b Barr..................0 Hill, not out ..................18 Wheatley, b Eedes .. .. 0 S o u th en d . Clare, b Eedes .. .. 3 Dawson, run out .. 3 Bngden, b Snapes .. .. 0 MarpettK, b Snapes .. .. 0 13 4, w 1 .. Total , , 35 ADDISCOMBE v. THE STYGIANS. Played at Addiscombe on Saturday, September 9. T h e S tyg ian s . First Innings. Second Innings. W. S. Shirley, b E. W. Foss ..1 2 b C. J. Foss..................0 Skinner, b C. J. F o s s ....................0 b C. J. Foss..................0 B. S. Cave, 1b w, b Langton .. 11 1 b w, b C. J. Foss .. 22 W. Sapte, b E. W. Foss .. .. 16 b C. J. Foss...................0 G. W. Henderson, b C. J. Foss.. 8 bE. W. Foss .. .. 7 E. G. Langton, b E. W. Foss .. 18 c R. Langton, b E. W. F oss........................12 W. Wells, b C. J. Foss....................0 1b w, b C. J. Foss .. 5 C. G. Baldwin, b E. W. Foss .. 2 run out...........................4 T. White, b E. W. Foss .. .. 4 c aud b C. J. Foss 2 J. W. W. Williams, not ou t.. 4 runout.......................... 0 C. Langton, b E. W. Foss ,. .. 0 not ou t.. .. ! i . 0 B 12,1-b 5, w 2 ...................19 B 10 ..................10 Total. Total 62 J. W. Ellis, b Skinner A. D. Coste, b Skinner C. J. Foss, b Sapte .. R. Langton,not out.. E. W. Foss, b Skinner A. C. Field, b Skinner F. Clay, c Skinuir, Williams.................. A d d isc o m b e . .. 17 R. J. Grant, c and b Williams..........................0 A. Pulford, b Williams .. 0 G. J. Frisch, c White, b Skinner..........................11 L. Cosfe, b Skinner.. .. 0 B 9 ,1-b 6 ..................15 GREVILLE v. WEST KENT WANDERERS. Played at Eton and Middlesex Ground on Thurs­ day, August 31, and was unfinished on account of the continued rain. W est K ent W a n d e r e r s . Wheeler, c Bates, b Lee .. 7 Haywood, b Lambert .. 0 Pocock, c Carswell, b Lee 13 Collins, b Lambert .. .. 1 Fox, b L e e ..........................2 E. Lolyd, not out ., .. 26 J. Coppinger, c Lee, b Lambert..........................6 E. Willsher, not out .. 5 B 2 ,1-b 2 ..................4 Total , 6 Total AUSTRALIANS v. SHAW ’S ELEVEN. Circumstances prevented the fulfilment of the original fixture for this match, played on the Hol- beck Becreation Ground, at Leeds, on Monday and Tuesday. It was intended that Shaw’s Australian Eleven should have met the Colonists, but Shrews­ bury had not recovered from the injury he received at Nottingham recently and Peate, owing to an accident on his way to the ground, was also unable to play. With the exception of the substitution of Lillywhite, however, the English team was a repre­ sentative one of Players. Again luck befriended Murdoch in the toss, but there was nothing gained when play ceased on Monday night. The result of the first innings was very singular. Each side made a total of 79, and curiously, too, in each 74 runs were got from the bat. The Holbeck ground is not at any time one for great run getting, and Sunday’s rain had not improved its condition. Hence the scoring of both eleveus was only low. The splendid bowling and fielding of the Austra­ lians again pulled them through, and their victory by 89 runs was a very creditable performance. Bonnor, who hurt bis arm at Scarborough, and Palmer, who is still too lame to play, stood out of the Australian team. McDonnell bit freely, and the hitting game was successful on the difficult wicket. He made 80 out of 190 scored by the Australians from the bat in their two innings. Lockwood was the only batsman who got double figures each time for Shaw’s eleven. When they went in with 127 to win, the English players had not the best light to bat in, but Spofforth and Boyle again proved irresistible, and the eleven were all dismissed for the insignificant total of 37. In the match Boyle took 12 English wickets at a cost of only 52 runs. Blackliam’s wicket-keeping, too, was very fine. On the English side Emmett was tho most successful bowler. His analysis shows 11 wickets for 66 runs. Barlow’s figures in the Australians’ second innings are also note­ worthy. Score and analyses :— A u stralian s , First Innings. H. H. Massie, b Midwinter.. ., 0 A. C. Bannerman, c Scotton, b Emmett ..................................7 \V. L. Murdoch, c Ulyett, b Mid­ winter ..........................................3 P. S. M'Donuell, c Barlow, b Emmett ..................................45 1’. Horan,b Midwinter.. ., .. 0 G. Giffen, b E m m e tt..................4 S. P. Jones, c Pilling, b Emmett 0 J. MeC. Blaekham, not out.. .. 12 T. W . Garrett, c Piling, b Mid­ winter ..........................................1 H. F. Boyle, c Selby, b Emmett.. 1 F. R. Spofforth, c LockwoJd, b Emmett ..................................1 B2, l-b l, w l, n-b 1 .. .. 5 Second Innings, c Lillywhite, b Mid­ winter ..................28 c Lockwood, b Mid­ winter .................. C b E m m ett.................. 5 c Emmett, b Barlow 85 c Selby, b Barlow ,. 13 notout..........................12 ll w, b Barlow .. .. 0 c Ulyett, b Emm ett.. 21 b E m m ett..................2 c Lockwood, b Emmett 0 1 b w, li Emmett B 7,1-b 3 .. Total .. Total..................................79 Total .. .J2G S h a w ' s E l e v e n . First Innings. Second Innings. Ulyett, c Massie, b Boylo .. .. 11 st Blackham, b Boylo 7 Barlow, c and b B oylo.................. 1 b Spofforth..................4 Lockwood, c Jones, b Boyle .. 80 c Murdoch, b Boyle .. 12 Bates, not out ..........................29 b Spofforth..................1 Midwinter, c Baunerman, b B o y le ........................................0 o Massie, b Boyle .. 1 Scottou, b Garrett........................1 c Blackham, b Spot- forth..........................1 Selby, c Spofforth, b Garrett .. 0 b Boyle...........................1 Emmett, 1 b w, b Garrett .. .. 1 st Blackham, b ’ Spot’ forth..........................4 Shaw, st Blackham, b Boyle ,. 1 c Jones, b Boyle 1 Pilling, c and b B o y le ..................0 c Jones, b Hpofforth.. 8 Lillywhite, c Giffen, b Bojle . . II not out.. .. 2 L - l ) ........................................5 B ................................2 Total.................................. 79 Total 87 ANALYSES OF BOWLING. A u stralian s . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R. W. O. M. R. W. Midwinter .. 20 11 81 4 .......................... 14 4 50 2 Emmett.. .. 21.1 18 30 f i ........................... 21.2 8 85 5 Ulyett .. ., 2 0 10 0 ........................... 11 5 19 0 Barlow . . . . 7 2 12 3 S h a w ' s E leven . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R W. O. M. R. W. Spofforth .. 18 5 80 0 ........................... 22.1 12 15 5 Boyle .. .. 21.3 8 82. 7 ............................................'. .,2214 Garrett .. .. 9 2 12 3 To-day the Australians begin their 34th match, against North of England at Manchester. Their remaining fixtures are 18, 19, and 20 September, at the Oval, v. Shaw’s Australian Eleven ; 21, 22 at Glasgow, v. Scotland; 23, 25, 26, at Harrogate, v. an Eleven of England. C kicket in I r e la n d . —John Lawrence’s Hand­ book of Cricket in Ireland. Double number, 16-17, 1880-81. Price Is. 6d., per post, Is. 8d. Now ready, contains list of Cricket and Football Clubs in Ireland, with names and addresses of Hon. Secs., and History of Cricket in Ireland in 1880-1881. Published by John Lawrence, Cricket and Lawn Tennis Outfitter, 63, Grafton-street, Dublin.— [A d v t .] C r ic k e t .— A song, written and composed by J. H. Smith, and dedicated to A. N. Hornby, Esq. “ It will be welcomed heartily by all lovers of the manly and truly national British game.”— Era. Post free, 18 stamps, of the author, 22, Clifton-street, Wolverhampton. — A d v t . B ooks or M agazines on C ricket .— The Manager of C bicket is prepared to buy any old books on cricket subjects.—Advt. A t Ben Roberson’s ground on August 12, for Albemarle v. Clifton, C. L. Torey (slow round), bowled 77 balls, 34 runs, all ten wickets. Tufnell Park, August 19, for Albemarle v. Highgate, T. Bowe bowled 30 balls for 6 runs and eight wickets. TH E COUN TY A V E R A G E S . I n continuation of the averages commenced in last week’s number we give herewith tables show­ ing the doings of batsmen as well as bowlers in connection with Notts, Gloucestershire, Surrey, and Sussex. These figures complete the statistics of the nine leading counties. Hampshire and Somersetshire have been omitted from this list as hardly entitled to positions in what is known as first-class cricket. NOTTINGHAMSHIRE. Nottinghamshire is fairly entitled to equality with Lancashire in the award of honours for this year’s County cricket. At the commence­ ment of the year it looked indeed as if it would outstrip the Champion shire of 1881 in the bid for the foremost place. Its defeat of Lancashire and the inauspicious manner in which the latter opened the campaign justified such a belief without doubt. On the form of May and June the Lancashire eleven were notopponents to be greatly feared, but they improved considerably as the season advanced. The same could hardly be said of Notts, and on the whole there was little to choose between them. Tho Nottinghamshire eleven had bad luck at times, that will be admitted. Owing to an injury to his foot, Morley was never quite himself. His bowling occasionally showed its old fire, but he was not seen at his best. Shrewsbury, too, was not as well as could have been wished. This was the more to be regretted as he is one of the soundest batsmen of English professionals, andmore than once he was muchmissed. His batting against Surrey at theOval, making every allowance for the weakness of the bowling, was one of the most brilliant displays of