Cricket 1882

august 31. 1888. CRICKET; A "WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. 2 6 5 DISTAFF v. MESSRS. R. AND H. PARNALL. Played at Forest Gate on Saturday, August 26, and resulted in a draw. The most notable feature in the game was tlie bawling of Mr. N. Thompson, who took six wickets for sixteen runs, the other bowlers being hit all over the field. Messrs. Gifford, Parnham, and Cassy all batted well. Silby, b C a s s y ..................8 Hall, b Chapman .. .. 7 J. Paraham, b Chapman.. 49 Hbatman, b N. Thompson 10 Parrott, b N. Thompson.. 12 Marsh, o Burrows, b N. Thompson ..................2 Thomas, b N. Thompson.. . .0 P arn all . C. Anthony, c Gifford, b N. Thompson.. .. Kingresse, b Chapman .. South, not o u t .................. J. H. Williams, b Thomp­ son .................................. E xtras.......................... Total D ista ff . Tritton, b Parrott ., Smith, b Parrott N. Thompson, not out W. Thompson, absent Gifford, not out........................23 Clarke, b Sharmm .. 0 I Cassy, c Marsh, b Parn­ ham ..................................2 5 I Chapman, o Marsh, b Parnham..................................................... ., 5 jTotal Burrows, b Parnham .. 8 1 McKay and Boston did not bat. 71 REIGATE PRIOEY v. EAST GRINSTEAD. Played at Reigate on Saturday, August 26. E ast G r in ste a d . First Innings. A. Huggatt, c Unlerwood, b W. W. Read .. .. 4 Lynn, run o u t ..................10 F. Padwiok, b Jones.. .. 3 Nye, c Underwood, b W. W. R a a d ..........................1 Sleight, c Durrant, b W. W. R ea d..........................15 R. P. Crawfurd, c and b W. W. R o a d ..................9 C. E. Collins, o Comber, b Jonos ..........................6 S. Payne, b W. W. Read.. 0 M'innion, b Jones .. .. 0 Charlwood, not out .. .. 10 Cheal, c Walby, b W. W. Read.......................... .. 6 B 5, n b 2 ..................7 Total 71 In tha second innings F. Padwiok scored (c W. W. Road, b Durrani) 13, Sleight (not out) 18, C. E. C dlins (c H. Nightin­ gale, b D arrant) 3, Charlwood (ran out) 1, Cheal (not out>0; total, 35. R e la ate P r io r y . Jones, b Huggctt _ .. 25 A. Darrant, e and b IIug- g e t t ..................................9 Rev. A. C. Davies, c Cheat, b M u n u io n ..................21 W. W. Raid, 1b w, b Lynn 42 H. Nightingale, c Cheal, b Munni'ni..........................18 W. Walby. b Munnion .. 0 Comber, c Pad .rick, b Lynn 9 W. U'lder.vood, c Sleight, b Munition ..................0 J. Nightingalo, not out .. 0 A. Read, c Cheal. b Mun­ nion ..................................8 S. Skelton, b Munnion .. 2 112,1-bl ..................3 very effective. The former has rarely been more successful; in the two innings he got twelve wickets for 99 runs. The wicket, as the sun dried it was almost unplayable forthe batsmen,but still, con­ sidering the Middlesex e’.even, it was a great per­ formance. Mr. C. T. Studd in the first, and Mr. Lyttelton in the second, played pluckily, but Mid­ dlesex were got out twice in three hours and a half for an aggregate of 168. This left Lancashire easy winners by an innings and *271 runs. The Lanca­ shire total of 439 is the largest, we believe, they have ever made. Score and analyses L a n c a sh ir e . K e n t . First Innings. Lord Harris, o Hill, b Emm ett.. 51 Mr. W. H. Patterson, c Hill, b Emmett .............................. 46 G. G. Hearne, h w, b Peate .. 20 Mr. E. F. S. Tylecote, 1 b w, b P e a te ....................................... 7 Mr. C. Wilson, o and b Peate .. 13 Mr. M. C. Kemp, b Ulyett .. .. 0 O’Shaughnessy, b Ulyett .. .. 11 F. Hearne, c Flaxington, b Peato 4 Mr. Foord-Kelcey, b Peato.. .. 11 Mr. F. Lipscomb, b Ulyett.. .. 0 Wootton, not o u t....................... 3 Extras ...............................8 .................174 Mr. A. N. Hornby, c Lyt­ telton, b C. T. Studd .. 11 Barlow, o Lyttelton, b Webbe ..........................21 Mr. A. G. Steel, c G. B. Studd, b Tuke .. .. 99 Rev. V. F. Royle, c Pear­ son, b Webbe..................63 Robinson, o Lyttleton, b W a lk e r......................... 101 Mr. F. Taylor, not out .. 00 Pilling, c G. B. Studd, b W a lk er..........................13 Mr. C. Haigh, b Walker.. 5 Watson, not out .. .. 23 Crossland, st Pearson, b W a lk e r..........................33 Nash, b T u k e ..................1 B 7 ,1-b 1, w 1 .. .. 9 T o t a l..................433 M id d l e s e x . First Innings. Socond Iunings. Hon. A. Lyttelton, b Nash.. .. 5 33 Mr. G. B. Studd, st Pilling, b Nash ......................................... 7 Mr. C. F. H. Leslie, b Steel 1 0 Mr. C. T. Studd, b Barlow .. 35 st Pilling, b Nash . 6 Mr. A. J. Webbe, b Barlow.. .. 2 c and b Barlow .. 2 Mr. I. D. Walker, b Nash .. 3 c Barlow, b Nash ’. 4 Mr. T. S. Pearson, e Crossland, b Nash......................................... 0 not ont.................. . 17 Mr. G. F. Vernon, b Barlow 0 st Pilling, b Nash . 13 Mr. P. J. T. Henery, b Nash 1 b Nash.................. . 0 Clarke, not out .......................... 4 c Stool, b Nash .. . 3 Mr. C. M. Tuke, b Nash .. .. 0 c Barlow, b Nash . 6 B ......................................... 12 Total................................. 70 Total .. . 98 Total .135 LANCASHIRE v. MIDDLESEX. The Lancashire eleven brought a very successful s e a 'o n to a triumphant close by their defeat of Middlesex on the Old Trallord Ground at Man­ chester on Saturday. Middlesex had a strong batting side, but their bowling was weakened by the absence of Burton, and he was very much missed. Mr. C. T. Studd, too, injured his hand, and was only able to bowl during the early part of the iunings. Throughout Mildlesex had so much the worst of the luck that they had not a look-in at any period of the game. In winning the toss Lancashire were able to bat on a wet and easy wicket against bowlers and fieldsmen who could not get a foothold, and they made the best use of their opportunities. The Middlesex team fielded well, some of them brilliantly, but Robinson, Messrs. Steel, Royle, and Taylor all got long scores, and, as they have often done before against southern bowling, Watson and Crossland even hit freely. Robinson’s hitting was very clean, but he had some luck, and the best cricket of the innings was shown by Messrs. Steel and Royle. Mr. Royle did not give a chance of any kind, Mr. Steel only one hard one at point until just before he was out. Mr. Taylor played very carefully for his 60 not out. With such a large total of 439 against them, and with the ground all against the bat, Middlesex had only the one outside chance of a draw. The three slow ,bowlers pf. Lancashire, however, had things all their own way! and Nash and Barlow were both C. T. Studd Clarke.. Tuke .. Webbo ANALYSES OF BOWLING. L an c a sh ir e . O. M. R.W. . 44IB 75 1 Walkor .. . 5523 58 0 Henery .. ,. 35.2 15 68 2 Lyttelton ,. 33 8 80 2 Lyttelton bowled a wido. O. M. R.W. 43 5 116 4 2 1 2 0 12 5 31 0 M id d l e s e x . First Innings. O. M R.W. S te e l........................14 11 7 1 N a sh .................... 26.2 12 36 6 Barlow .. .. 13 9 15 3 Second Innings. O. M. R.W. .............. 3 1 8 0 .................. 21.1 6 63 6 .................. 19 10 27 3 Total. Seoond Innings, c Lockwood, b Poate.. 54 b Peate..........................1 c Lockwood,b Emraett 0 o Hill, b Bates .. ..1 3 not out..........................58 b E m m e tt..................0 b Ulyett ..................38 retired hurt..................0 c Lookwood, b Emmett 4 o Emmett, b Hill .. 2 b H i l l ..........................3 E xtras.................. 17 Total .. ..185 KENT v. YORKSHIRE. Kent brought a rather unsuccessful season to a close at Gravesend on Saturday with a very credit­ able victory over the Yorkshire eleven. Lord Harris had not won the toss since the middle of July, but this time luck favoured him, and the first innings helped materially to give Kent the victory. Rain interfered with the play on each of the three days, and the YTorkshiremen had the worst of the wickets. The feature of the match was Lord Har­ ris’s batting for Kent, and his two scores of 51 and 54 were both very good performances, considering the quality of the Yorkshire bowling. He hit with great freedom each time, playing the fast bowling especially with great confidence. Mr. Patterson and he made 90 runs before a wicket fell in Kent’s first innings, Mr. Wilson, who came out so well against the Australians at Canterbury, showed thoroughly good cricket. He plays very hard on the ball, and Cambridge certainly overlooked a very good cricketer in leaving him out of this year’s University eleven. Peate hit finely in Yorkshire’s second innings, but the wicket was against run- getting when they were in, and the fast bowling at times got up nastily. The ground suited Mr. Foord- Kelcey’s express delivery, and,he took eight of the ten wickets for 53 . runs. Kent won by 101 runs. Scofre and analyses i— Y o rk sh ire . First Innings. Ulyett,b Harris .. ... .. ..4 1 Bates, b W ootton..........................7 Hon. M. B. Hawke, c Tylecote, b L ip scom b..................................4 Lookwood, b W ootton..................1 Emmett, c G. Hearne, b Lips- c o m b ......................................... 20 Flaxington, c G. Hcarno, b Woot­ ton ......................................... 13 Hall, run o u t..................................0 Grimshaw, c G. Hearne, b Woot­ ton ......................................... 7 Hill, b Foord-K elcey..................1 Peate, o Wilson, b Foord-Keloey 3 Hunter, not out .. ..................3 Extras ..................................6 Second Innings, c Wilson, b Foord- Kelcey ..................10 c Lipscomb, b Foord- Kelcey ..................14 c Tylecote, b Foord- Kelcey ..................5 c Lipscomb, b G. H e a r n e ..................21 b Foord-Kelcey .. .. 0 b Foord-Kelcey .. .. 9 b Foord-Kelcey .. .. 5 o Tyleooto, b Foord- Keloey ..................23 c Kemp, b Wootton .. 9 o Tylecote, b Foord- Kelcey ..................31 not out......................... 5 E xtras..................17 Total. ,103 Total .,153 ANALYSES OF BOWLING. K en t . First Inniugs. O. M. R.W. Ulyett.. Peate .. Hill .. Emmett Bates .. 18 17 5 44 8 85 0 23 1? 23 7 30 Second Inuings. O. M. R.W. 17 6 82 26 15 61 12.1 5 24 82 18 32 13 10 19 Y ork sh ire . First Inniugs. O. M. R.W. Lipscomb .. .. 12 0 49 2 .. Wootton *. .. 23 5 8 i 4 .. Lord Harris .. 2 0 2 1 . . . . Foord-Kelcey .. 9.2 4 11 2 G. Hearne Second Innings. O. M. R.W . . . . . 81 8 0 .. .. 27 8 51 1 .. .. 9 2 17 0 35 13 53 8 10 7 6 Foord-Kelcey bowled a wide. BEDDINGTON v. HORLEY. Played at Beddiugton on Saturday, August 12, the home team winning by 34 run3 on the first innings. B eddington . Seoond Innings. 8 cW. Kelsey,b Jennings 83 First Innings. J. Henderson, run out J. Dives, b Jennings . A. Tomkins, b Brackpool 43 c H. P. Webber, Brackpool .. .. 3 10 c E. Kelsey, b Jen­ nings..........................0 18 run out..........................4 Capt. Muggeridge, b Griffith .. R. Himtlerson, c W. Kelsey, b Farwell......................................... 16 notout...............................53 J. Aris, b Brackpool ..................1 E. P. Shute, b Griffith..................0 A. F. Stevens, c W. Kelaey, b Jennings ..................................8 Rev. J. Graham, run out .. .. 6 F. Dutton, not out ..................1 W. M. North, run o u t ..................0 B 8, 1-b 3, w 2 ..........................13 not out..........................4 Total. .121 b Brackpool..................9 B 5, 1-b 2, w1 .. 8 Total .. .. 120 II orley . W. Taylor, 1 b w, b R. Hendersou .................. 21 F. Brackpool, b T. Hender­ son ..................................7 A. Jennings, 1 b w, b T. Hendersou ...................2 H. W. Butler, run out .. 0 H. Webber, not out .. ..8 3 J. Griffith, b It. Henderson 11 F. Jennings, 1 b w, b T. Henderson .................. 0 II. P. Webber, c Mug­ geridge, b T. Henderson 0 W. N. Kelsey, c and b R. Henderson .................4 Dr. Farwell, c Tomkins, b T. Henderson .. .. 2 E. Kelsey, l b w , Ii T. Henderson .................8 L-b 3, n b 1................ 4 Total 90