Cricket 1882

248 CRICKET; A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. a u g u s t 24, mm . CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY—PAST AND PRESENT—v. AUSTRALIANS. For the third time a Cambridge team has beaten an Australian eleven. Most students of cricket will remember the victories of Cambridge University at Lord’s in 1878, and Cambridge in 1882, and the vic­ tory at Portsmouth on Saturday last thus forms the third successive win of the Cantabs against Aus­ tralian cricketers. Tho University team was decidedly strong, but the Australians had to play without the help of Palmer and Giffen, and the former’s bowling was much wanted, Murdoch won the toss for the Australians, but he decided to give Cambridge the innings, a very questionable policy at any time, unless the advantages are thoroughly clear. The wicket was slow throughout, and the scoring in none of the four innings reached 200. Some good cricket though was shown on both sides, and the interest in the game was maintained until the very close. The best as well as the higliost contri­ bution for Cambridge was the Hon. A. Lyttelton’s second score of 60, and this innings will give addi­ tional interest to his appearance for England against Australia at the Oval on Monday. The feature of the Colonial batting undoubtedly was Bonnor’s hitting on the third day. He made 66 out of 79 while at the wickets, and he was at the wickets in all about 40minutes. He was twice missed at short-slip, but his hitting was quite sensational. His figures included four sixes. When he was out the Australians wanted 113 to win with eight bats­ men still to go in. As these included Murdoch, Horan, Blackham, and McDonnell their chances were highly estimated ; but Mr. Steel bowled so effectively and the Cantabs one and all fielded up so well, that at the finish the Australians were 20 runs to the bad. The victory of the English amateurs was received with enthusiastic delight by the spec­ tators, and it was some time before the excitement subsided. Much of their success was due to the fine bowling of Mr. A. G. Steel. He took five wickets for 24 runs—a fine performance. Mr. C. H. Allcock, a player who always showed very fair form at Cambridge, though never able to get his blue, deserves a word of praise. He bowled ex­ tremely well, and in the two innings was credited with six wickets for 70 runs. Score and analyses:— A u str a lia n s . First Innings. O. M. R.W. Morton .. 21 7 44 2 C. Studd .. .. 18 8 82 2 S teel.................. 18 10 24 0 Allcock . . . . 9 4 19 2 Smith.................11.1 5 16 4 Second Innings. O. M. R.W. 24 12 81 16 7 38 41 30 24 30 14 51 20 10 84 3 1 7 OLD BRUCIANS v. ST. LAWRENCE. Played at Canterbury on Wednesday and Thurs­ day, August 16 and 17, and resulted in a draw. S t . L aw rence . II. Crowther, b G. Bird .. 0 Captain Austin, b G. Bird 1 G. Gardner, not out.. .. 10 W. G. Morgan, absent .. 0 B 19,1-b 2 ................ 21 ALDERSHOT DIVISION v. BROADWATER. Playecl at Aldershot on Friday and Saturday, August 18 and 19. A ld e r s h o t D iv is io n . First Innings. F. Blacker (4th Hussars), b P. Paravicini...............................12 T. Langrishe (R.A), c Bannatine, b C ottrell...............................6 E. Wynyard (3rd W.R.), c H. Paravicini, b Holden .. .. 54 E. Pocklington (15th Hussars), b C ottrell............................ 1 St. C. Oswald (3rd Hussars), c Bannatine, b Cottrell .. .. 0 G. Lushington (2nd Queen’s), b Holden...................................4 Private Sutterfield (2ndQueen’s), b C ottrell...........................20 R. G. Long (3rd Hussars), b Cottrell................................... 0 H. Curtis (R.A.), not out .. .. 1 Capt. Bowers (5th D.G.), c Sim- monds, b Holden ................ Capt. Lightfoot (2nd Queen’s), c Cottrell, b H old en ..............3 B 4, 1-b 4............................8 Second Innings. c Stafford, b Cottrell 18 b P. Paravicini .. .. 8 c H. Paravicini, b P. Paravicini .. .. 15 c H. Paravicini, b C ottrell................0 c W. Marshall, b C ottrell................ 9 b Cottrell .. . c and b Cottrell. b P. Paravicini , not out .. . 1 absent b P. Paravicini .. B 3, 1-b 1 Bass, c G. Bird, b Drury.. 92 . Twynam, b Drury .. 7 . Thomson, b Drury .. 14 E. Waterfield, c Drury, b Robson ................ 52 Jones, lb w, b Robson 1 W. Gay, c Shaw, b Drury . 11 R.G. Hodgson, b G. Bird 1 O ld B rucians . First Inn’ngs. G. T. Drury, b Twynam .. .. F. R. Bird,b Hodgson .. E. Foa, 1b w, b Twynam .. '. W. Botsford, b Twynam W. W. Reeve, c Gardner, Twynam ........................ Robson, c Austin, b Twynam . 29 . A. Brewer, c Gardner, b Twynam ..................................15 . Strode, b Waterfield .» .. 0 _ .Shaw, c Be88, b Twynam .. 2 R. W. D. Hill, not out................2 G. W. Bird, c Waterfield, b Twy­ nam ...........................................1 B 4, w 2 ................ ..... .. 6 Total................................121 Total.............................. 110 Total OLD BRUCIANS v. ASHFORD. Played at Asliford on Friday and Saturday, August 18 and 19, and resulted in an easy win for the Old Bruoians by 145 runs. C a m b r id g e . First Innings. Hon. A. Lyttelton, b Jones .. 25 Mr. C. I. Thornton, b Spofforth . 45 Mr. A. P. Lucas, run out .. .. 42 Mr. C. T. Studd, c Murdoch, b Bannerman...............................28 Mr. G. B. Studd, c Blackham, b B o y le .................................. 1 Mr. A. G. Steel, b Boyle .. .. 18 Hon. E. Lyttelton, c Boyle, b Spofforth...........................18 Mr. H. Whitfeld, not out .. .. 5 Mr. C. H. Allcock, c Spofforth, b B o y le ......................................0 Mr. C. A. Smith, b Spofforth .. 2 Mr. P. H. Morton, c Murdoch, b Spofforth...............................4 B 6,1-b 1, n b 1 ................ 8 Second Innings, c M‘Donnell, b Boyle . 60 c M'Donriell, b Boyle . 1 b Spofforth.................3 c Banncrman, b Boyle 12 c Boyle, b Spofforth .. 13 c Bannerman, b Boyle 19 c Boyle, b Spofforth .. 8 c Spofforth, b Boyle .. 5 b Spofforth................ 7 b Spofforth................ 0 B r o a d w a te r . Rev. A. Simmonds, c Wyn­ yard, b Lushington .. 16 G. H. Longman, c Bowers, b C u rtis....................... 14 H. F. de Paravicini, c Oswald, b Lushington .. 44 R. A. Bannatine, c Blacker, b C u rtis.......................6 C. E. Cottrell, c Wynyard, b Sutterfield................29 P. J. de Paravicini, c and b Lushington .. .. 64 M. Marshall, c Oswald, b C u rtis....................... 1 R. G. Dutton,b Sutterfield 25 W. F. Stafford, b Oswald W.Marshall,b Lushington 4 Holden, not out .. .. 4 B 16, 1-b 3, w 1.. ..2 0 Total .257 OLD BRUCIANS v. FAYERSHAM. Played at Faversham on Monday and Tuesday, August 14 and 15. F a v e r sh a m . not out.. .. B 3 ,1-b 13 Total .196 Total .. ..152 A u stralian s . First Innings. S. P. Jones, b Morton.................4 J. M‘C. Blackham, c G.B. Studd, b C. T. S tu d d ........................35 T. W. Garrett, c A. Lyttelton, b C. T. Studd.............................. 14 A. C. Bannerman, 1b w, b Smith 23 W. L. Murdoch, b Morton.. .. 0 T. Horan, c Steel, b Smith.. .. 18 H. H. Massie, c and b Allcock .. 1 P. S. M‘Donnell, b Allcock.. .. 11 G. J. Bonnor, not out................12 H. F. Boyle, b Sm ith................ 14 F. R. Spofforth, b Smith .. .. 0 B ......................................6 Second Innings. b Morton ................ c A. Lyttelton, b All­ cock ........................ cE. Lyttelton, b Stoel 5 c A. Lyttelton, b All­ cock ....................... 80 c Steel, b Allcock .. 43 c and b Steel .. .. 9 b Allcock .................6 c Thornton, b Steel .. 5 c and b Steel .. .. 66 b Steel........................11 not out....................... 0 B 1,1-b 1 .. .. 2 First Innings. W. H. Patterson, b Freeman .. 15 W. Bryant, b Strode...............6 F. H. Lacey, c Robsen, b Strode...................................... Rev. W. B. Weighell, st Rowe, b Freeman ...............................87 J. J. Patterson, b Strode .. .. 8 J. Foord-Kelcey, b Hill .. .. 80 G. K. Anderson, c Botsford, b Hill ...................................17 W. L. Courtney, b Hill .. .. 44 W. Stunt, b H ill..................... 2 S. Neame, c and b Freeman .. 1 P. B. Neame, not o u t..............0 B 8, 1-b 2 ............................5 Second Innings. b R ob son ....................32 c and b Foa................ 8 c Robson, b H ill.. .. c Robson, b Foa.. .. 31 b H i l l ...........................67 cBotsforJ, b Hill ..1 7 b H i l l ....................... c Freeman, b Botsford absent........................ not out............................0 b Botsford.....................0 B 21,1-b5, w 2 .. 28 Total. .168 Total Total.............................. 141 Total ANALYSES OF BOWLING. C a m b rid ge. ..187 First Innings. O. M. R.W. Boyle............. 47 20 55 8 Garrett .. .. 26 12 39 0 Spofforth .. .. 28.2 18 42 4 Jones................ 12 4 22 1 Bannerman .. 20 9 80 1 M‘Donnell Second Innings. O. M.R.W. .. .. 49 2 i 63 5 .. .. 8 4 15 0 33 20 42 5 9 8 16 0 O ld B ru cian s . First Innings. Second Innings. A. A. Brewer, c Courtney, b J. J. Patterson ......................5 b Foord-Kelcey .. C. Robson, c Bryant, b Foord- Kelcey ...................................11 run out........................ W. W. Robson, bW.H. Patterson 26 c Bryant, b Foord- Kelcey ................. R. W. D. Hill, c Weighell, b W. H. Patterson .................... 67 notout......................... E. Strode, c W. H. Patterson, b Foord-Kelcey .................... 14 not out......................... P. Freeman, b Fcord-Kelcey .. 28 A. F. R. Bird, 1 b w, b Foord- Kelcey ....................................5 J. W. Botsford, c Stunt,b Foord- Kelcey ....................................2 E. C. Foa, c Stunt, b W. H. Pat­ terson ...................................1 L. Shaw, b W. H. Patterson .. 7 C. L. Graham, not out.................3 run ont........................... B 9 ,1-b 4, w 2........................15 B .......................... Total..................................181 Total .. 84 Total .210 2 6 40 7 i 11 Second Innings. not out........................0 c Austin, b Hodgson . 17 b M orga n .................81 not out.. b Morgan .. 41 .. 10 st Austin, b Twynam. \ c Bass, b Twynam .. 5 c Waterfield, b Twy­ nam ....................... 11 B 8,1-b2, w 2, n b 1 13 Total ..150 O ld B ru cia n s. First Innings. Second Innings. E. Strode, b Avery ............... . 0 7 9H . 9 0 c and b Avery .. . 9 J. W. Botsford, b Avery . 2 33 R. W. 1). Hill, c Fox, b Avery . 12 IH C. Robson, c Furley, b Fox.. L. Shaw, b Avery................ . 10 c Avery, b Fox .. . 3) , o b Avery..................... G. W.Bird, b Fox................ , 1 c Handcock, b Avery . 0 0 not out..................... 10 B 2,1-b 4 .. . (5 Total .. . .146 A shford . First Innings. H. B. Fox, absent....................... 0 Second Innings. 1 W. G. Handcock, c Hill, b Strode......................................6 J. S. S. Spicer, c and b G. Bird.. 8 A. McBain, 1b w,b G. Bird.. .. 0 G. Furley, b G. B ir d ................ 0 C. Avery, not o u t....................... 19 T. Kingsnorth, c Shaw, b G. Bird ..................................... 3 C. Cook, b G. Bird ................ 5 ~ Hammond, b G. Bird .. .. 0 E. J. Spicer, b G. Bird................0 J. R. Bayley, stReeve, b G. Bird . 1 1b w, b G. Bird .. .. 6 b Strode ..............1 c E. Foa, b G.Bird..1 1 b G. B i r d ..............0 c Robson, b G.Bird.. 0 not out..................... 1 absent.....................0 b G. B ir d ..............0 b G. B ir d ..............3 absent.....................0 B 1,1-b 1 .. .. 2 Total...............................42 Total ..25 LANCASHIRE v. SURREY. Chiefly through the effective delivery of Cross­ land, Lancashire were able to beat the Surrey eleven at the Oval before luncheon-time on the second day (Tuesday). The wicket, though it did not play badly, was not easy, and Lancashire, who won the toss, were dismissed for 188. Jones bowled very well, bowling four of the five wickets he got for 67 runs. Pooley, who was verj lame, was not at his best at the wicket, but the Surrey fielding all round and the catch of Mr. W. W. Read at point, which got rid of Robinson, was one of the best features of the day’s cricket. As last year, the Surrey batsmen played Crossland without nerve, and with the wicket to help him a little, his pace utterly demoralised the southerners. Maurice Read hit well for his nineteen, but except Mr. Roller, who played pluckily, no one else showed any confi­ dence, and the last five batsmen failed to get a run between them. In all Crossland got six wickets for 26 runs, and when he went on asecond time he took five wickets for one run. In their second innings Surrey, thanks to Messrs. Roller, Parfitt, aud