Cricket 1882

8 CEICIvET; A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. MAY 10, 1882. the advisability of having a good lob bowler on the side. I am one of those who re­ member the feeble show Murdoch’s Eleven made against Walter Humphrey’s very moderate underhand bowling at Brighton two years ago. Rightly or wrongly it is my belief that good “ lobster ” would be more destructive than any other kind of bowler against the team just arrived in England. I h a v e not as yet seen any Cricket at Cambridge, but a few’ notes on the principal executants in the recent trials at Oxford may be of interest. Of the Seniors J, G. Walker, who was prevented by ill-health from playing last year is decidedly the best bat. He got his fifty-five in the Seniors match in very good form. Besides being a remarkable safe and painstaking bat, he is an excellent field. The eighty-nine of D. H. Barry of Brasenose, makes him a likely candidate for the team, but he will in all likelihood have to be tried several times before any definite conclusion can be come to as to his capabilities against Oxford bowling ; his fielding too is also hardly up to the mark. E . D. Shaw (Oriel) scored thirty runs in the same match in fairly good form, but he has a tendency to put the ball up on the off-side, and seems to lose patience after scoring twenty or thirty runs. He is a very smart field, however, at point, and can bowl slow overhand with great break, and a fair command of pitch. T. R. Hine-Haycock an oldWellingtonian, though he only scored fourteen for the Seniors, is a useful bat, and takes the wicket very fairly. G. G. Gutterez an old Wykehamist, if he practised his lob bowling, might be very useful as he has great batting powers, and is one of the best fields at cover point at Oxford. C, G. Mallam’s slow bowling may probably be of service, but at present he is not well, The batting of C, P. Wilson (Rossall) was the best in the Freshmen’s match; in fact it was the only display of any merit through­ out the game, A. L . Stewart’s bowling, (fast) was the best on that occasion, E . W. Bastard, of Sherborne, and C. L . Hickley, (Winchester) who both bowl slow left, did fairly well, especially the former, but they are both moderate bats, - and only poor in the field. bowled seven overs and two balls for four runs and four wickets. The Sixteen won easily by an innings and 82 runs. S econd I nnings . N ext Mr. E. O. Powell c Wright b Spencsr .. 23 Mr. C. H. Wlieater c Paravicini b Ramsay 6 Mr. W. H. Bather c Para- vicini b Luxton .. .. 21 Mr. P. J. T. Henery c Wright b C. T. Studd 29 Mr. C. Wilson c aud b Spencer ..................14 Hon. J. W. Mansfield 1b-w b Spencer .. .. 87 Mr. F. W. Capron b Roe .. 8 Mr. H. M. Leaf b Spencer 1 Mr. H. G. Owen b Luxton 41 S ixteen . Mr. C. A. Smith c Spen- cer b G. B. Studd .. 21 Mr. H. C. Benbow b G. B. Studd .................. 0 Mr. W. P. Richardson c Paravicini b Spencer 2 Mr. L. M. Richards 1b w, b S p e n ce r ..................4 Mr. C. E. Chapman, not out 28 Mr. J. A. Scott, b C. T. S tu d d ..........................5 Mr. H. G. Topham, st Wright, b Paravicini 2 Byes 7 ,1-b 7, n-b 1 .. 15 Total..................251 ^ C R I C K E T v f l T - r C / I M B R I D G E . FIRST TWELVE v. NEXT SIXTEEN. The third trial match of the University season was played at Cambridge on Thursday last and two following days. The rains had interfered so much with the ground that a fresh wicket had to be ob­ tained on Saturday, when the game was concluded. Some fair hatting was shown by the Sixteen, notably by Hon. J. W. Mansfield, the Winchester captain of 1881, H. G. Owen, P. J. Henery, an Old Harrovian, E. 0. Powell, Old Carthusian. Bather, one of the Rossall eleven of 1880, again played well. C. A. Smith, the Charterhouse fast bowler of last year, got nine wickets in the two innings of the Twelve. In the second he T he T w elve . First Innings. Second Innings. J. E. K. Studd, b Smith .. 8 c and b Chapma 1 .. G. B. Studd, c Owen, b S m ith ..................................82 E. A. J. Maynard, b Smith 0 C. W. Wright, b Smith .. 8 C. T. Studd, c Leaf, b C h apm an .......................... W. N. Roe, c Topham, b S m ith ..................................16 R. Spencer, c Henery, b Richards ..................* .. 7 F. M. Lucas, st Richard­ son, b Richards.................. 3 J. Lees not o u t ..................8 P. J. de Paravicini. b Scott 4 R. C. Ramsay, c Wilson, b Scott ..................................0 C. H. Luxton, c Richard­ son, b Scott..........................5 L-b......................................... 1 c Leaf, b Chapman b S m ith .................. b Richards .. 3 c Owen, b Scott b Chapman ..................0 b S m ith ..........................18 b S m ith ..........................0 c Richardson, b Scott .. 2 h w, b Richards .. .. 2 b S m ith ..........................0 notout ..........................1 Byes 2 ,1-b1, n-b 1 4 Total..........................95 Total .. .. 74 After the match two elevens were formed under the captaincy of Messrs. A. G. Steel and G. B. Studd. Henery 28, Owen 20, aud Capron 20, con­ tributed chiefly for Mr. Steel’s side, and the game was ultimately drawn ; Mr. Studd’s eleven having scored 48 for five wickats, against a total of 125. FRESHMEN’S MATCH. This annual match was played at Cambridge on May 1st and 2nd. Some fair batting was shown by Mansfield the Winchester Captain of 1881 and Booth of Marlborough. M r . G. B. S tudd ’ s S ide . First Innings. P. J. de Paravicini (Eton aud Trinity), st Richardson b Leaf 2 C. W. Wright (Charterhouse & Trinity), 1 b w, b Leaf .. .. 17 Hon. J. W. Mansfield (Winchester & Trinity), c Richardson, b Leaf .......................................................! ......................... 12 B. de B. Carey (Clifton & Emmanuel), c Polhill-Turner, b L e a f.......................................................................11 C. E. Chapman (Lincolnshire & Sidney), c Legge, b Sm ith.. 17 C. L. Booth (Marlborough & Trinity Hall), not out .. 31 G. F. Campbell (Fettes »&Clare), b Smith................................. 2 C. Hose (Felstead & Jesus), b Smith ......................................... 0 H. B. Peele (Eton & Jesus), b S m ith .........................................3 H. C. N. Hardwick (Marlborough & Trinity Hall), b Leaf .. 12 H. G. Topham (Repton & Jesus), b Smith ..........................2 G. B. Studd (captain), b S m it h ................................................1 Leg bye ........................................................ 1 Total .........................................— 111 Second Innings. De Paravicini, b Smith .. 2 |Hose, c Simpson, b Leaf .. 14 Wright, c Hawke, b Leaf .. 24 IPeele,c Richardson,b Long- Mansfield, c Smith, b Long- | worth .............. 7 w o r t h ..................................17 |Hardwick, c sub, b Morgan 2 ™ ’ * 1 De B. Carey, 1) Longworth .. 3 |Topham. c sub, b Leaf Chapman, c Polhill-Turner, |Studd, not o u t .................. b M o r g a n .......................... o\\ B 2,1 b 2 .................. Booth, c Polhill-Turner, b | S m ith ..................................8 1 T o t a l .................. Campbell, c aud b Longworth 7 j M r. C. T. S tudd’s Side. First Innings. Hon. M. B. Hawke (Eton & Magdalene), b Paravicini .. H. M. Leaf (Marlboro’ & Trinity), c Studd, b Topham .. W. P. Richardson (Clifton and Christ’s), b Paravicini .. .. R. A. H. Simpson (Haileybury & Pembroke), b Chapman A. J. Polhill-Turner (Eton and Trinity Hall), c Wright, b T o p h a m ................................................................................. R. H. Legge (Liverpool and Trinity Hall), b Chapman .. C. A. Smith (Charterhouse & St. John’s), b Topham E. D. Longworth (Charterhouse & Trinity), not out J. E. S. Moore (Felstead & Sidney), c Carey, b Paravicini .. E. T. W. Hawkey (Sherborne & Trinity Hall) c Peele, b P aravicini................................................................................. W. Morgan (Downing), b Paravicini.......................................... C. T. Studd (captain), b Chapman ......................................... Byes .. ................................................................................. T o t a l ......................................................................... Hawke, c Hardwicke, b Para­ vicini .................................2 Leaf, c and b Topham.. .. 8 Simpson, b Chapman .. .. 2 Polhill-Ttimer, not out .. 23 Smi-h, b Topham.................0 |Moore, c Studd, b Topham 11 1Morgan, b Chapman . . . . 6 B 5, 1b 1 .. .. 6 T o t a l ..................61 C.vius C ollece v. P embroke C ollege . —Played at Cambridge, May 3. Score :—Caius College, 92 and 57 (for two wickets) ; Pembroke College, 35. T r in it y H a ll v . T r in it y C olleg e , May 5.— Trinity H a ll 107 ; Trinity 22 and 41. C aibs C ollege v . M a gd . ylens , May 5 and 6.— Caius won by 86 runs. Temple in first innings of Magdalene took nine wickets for ten runs. Caius. 71 and 96 ; Magdalene 37 and 44. T p : $ C 0 I ^ E v B 0 0 K . M.C.C. AND GROUND v. TWENTY-TWO COLTS'. OF MIDDLESEX. As usual, the Marylebone season was opened with this Match at Lord’s last week. Owing to the rain a commencement was not possible on Thursday, and on Friday the ground was so tricky that reliable batting was out of the ques­ tion. Mr. F. Francis played steadily for his nineteen, but otherwise the batting was very poor. Mr. Tootel (fast round left), was fairly success­ ful in the same match last year for the Colts, took six Marylebone wickets for seventeen runs, and Mr. Chapman (fast round) five for fifteen. For M.C.C. Flowers’ thirteen wickets cost 33 runs. He took three wickets with three balls. The msch was drawn all in favour of the Colts M.C.C. Mr. E. J. C. Studd, c Gardiner, b Barber..........................................15 Fothergill, 1 b w,b Chapman .. 8 Mr. G. F. Yernou, c Oxlev, b Barber......................................... 9 Mr. H. E. Rhodes, c Oxley, b Perkins..........................................8 Flowers, c Tootel, b Chapman .. 14 Mr. G. S. Foljambe, b Tootel .. 0 Mr. H. J. Hill, b Tootel .. .. 0 Mr. H. F. de Paravicini, c Bodger, b Chapman..................................7 Mr. J. Robertson, not out .. 4 Rvlott, b Tootel ........................2 Sherwin, b Tootel ................0 57 c Francis, b Meller .. 1 c Gardiner, b Chapman 0 c Thornton, b Meller 10 b Read.......................... 2 c Francis, b Meller .. 1 c Read, b Chapman .. 3 b Meller ..................10 c Ker, b Tootel b Ker .. .. not out b Tootel W .. 11 0 i; 9 , 1 Total . 70 C ults . Mr. W. H. Clifton, c Flowers, b R y lo tt......................... : .. 2 Mr. F. Francis, c and b Rylott .. 19 Mr. A. G. Andrews, b Flowers .. 1 Mr. A. J. Goodridge, c Hill, b Flowers ..................................4 Mr. H. Meller, c Foljambe, b R y lo tt........................................ 11 Mr. N. H. Maiuwaring, c Paravi­ cini, b F low ers......................... 5 G. Perkins, c Studd, b Flowers .. 0 Mr. R. W. Ker, c and b Flowers 0 Mr. J. H. French, b Flowers .. 0 Mr. J. 11. M*Cnlloch, b Flowers .. 4 S. H. Bodger, b Rylott .. .. 0 Mr. A. A. Brewer, c Paravicini, b Flowers ................................. 5 Mr. li. W. D. Hill, b Flowers .. 1 Mr. S. Chapman,c Studd, b Rylott 5 Mr. W. Brown, cVernon,bFlowers 0 Mr. H. L. Gardiner, run out .. ] I. Tott, b R y lo t t .........................(J C. Read, c Fothergill. b Flowers.. 5 Barber, c and b Flowers .. 2 Mr. J. H. Oxley, not o u t .................. Mr. F. Tootel, c Paravicini, b Flowers......................................... o Mr. G. H. Tate, absent .. 0 Mr. P. M. Thornton (captain), c and b Rylott .........................O B .........................................4 b Rylott not out not out 7 10 2 c Studd, b Flowers.. 2 Total 71 Total.