Cricket 1882

MAY 10, 1882. CRICKET; A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. reached there in time to take part iu the third match, and his play was consistently fine through­ out. The highest score of the whole tour was their 313 for the loss of only two wickets against twenty- two of San Francisco; their best performances in Australia were 327 against 20 of Ballarat, 309 and 243 for two wickets iu the last eleven a side match against the Australian team. Ulyett’s not out 167 at San Francisco and 149 at Melbourne in the return match with the Australian eleven were the best individual innings. The tables of batting and bowling averages show some very creditable figures, andwithout exception the team, one and all, played quite up to some of them decidedly above, their English form. Ulyett'a average of 1,424 for 46 innings, without the advantage of one not out, is a great performance, averaging as he does 33.5 per innings. Bates and Barlow also scored over a thousand runs, and Shrewsbury runs the Lanca­ shire Stonewall very close. His play was con­ sistent throughout. In the bowlingPeate thoroughly upheld his reputation as the best of English bowlers, and considering the wickets on which he had usually to perform, his average of 5,224 Eor 264 wickets is an exceptionally fine one. Midwinter was one of the most useful members of he team, as the figures show, and as a bowler he iertainly advanced considerably the reputation le had previously gained in England. Bates hit vith great vigour, but lie had very bad luck at imes with the bat, and the high opinion generally leld of him as an all round cricketer was shown by he numerous offers he received of engagements in the colonies. Shaw did not bowl himself very nuch, but his average is very good, and more than mae he proved beyond a doubt that ho has even yet no superior as a bowler. Financially the trip was a great success, and after paying each member of the team the sum agreed on, besides a bonus, it is believed that the three promoters will each clear about £1,500. Shaw’s sportsman-like conduct on one occasion in agreeing to play out the matchwhen things were not looking well for him, will, we feel sure, not be forgotten ; and as it is stated that he has made the only amend required to re-establish himself with the Committee of the Notts County Club, it is to be hoped that the disagreement of last year has now been healed for ever. Each of the team was presented by the managers with a gold medal in recognition of the excellent cricket shown, and a special presentation was made by the principal Lancastrians in the colonies to Barlow and Pilling, who made themselves very popular on the other side. RESULTS OF MATCHES. Matches played 80 ; won 15 ; lost 3; drawn 12. 1881. Oct. 1, 8, Shaw’s Team .................. . 277 . — . 277 Philadelphia .. 12 of Philadelphia .......... 126 . 47 . 173 Won by an innings and 104 runs. Oct. 5,6, Shaw’s Team...................... . 254 . — . 254 Hoboken .... 18 of New York.................. . 65 . . 46a. 111 Drawn, a Thirteen wickets down. Oct. 7, 8.10, Shaw’s Team .................. . 114 . 163 . 280 Philadelphia .. 18 of America .................. . 71 . 77 . 148 Won by 132 runs. Oct 12,13, Shaw's Team .................. . 144a . — . 144 St. Louis.......... 22 of St. Louis.................. . — . — . — Drawn a Five wickets down. In cessant rain. Oct. 20, 21, Shaw's Team .................. . 91 . 313a. 411 Sau Francisco 22 of San Francisco .. . 44 . — . 44 Drawn. aTwo wickets down. Nov. 23, 24, Shaw’s T ea m .................. . 157 . 15a. 172 Maitland 22 of Maitland.................. 183 . 123 . 236 Drawn, a One wicket down. Nov. 25, 26, Shaw’s Team .................. 118 . 75 . 193 Newcastle ... 22 of Newcastle .............. . 79 . 79a. 158 Drawn, a Nine wickets down. Nov. 29, 30, Shaw's Team .................. . 199 . — . 199 Orange .......... 22 of Orange...................... . 65 . 39 . 104 Won by an innings and 95 runs. Dec. 2, 3, Shaw’s Team .................. . 115 . 73 . 188 Bathurst .... 22 of Bathurst.................. Won by 68 runs. 44 . 68 . 112 Dec. 6, 7, Shaw’s Team .................. . 61 . 64 . 125 Cumberland 22 of Cumberland.............. . 78 . 48a. 126 Lost by five wickets, a Sixteen wickets down. «ec. 9,10.12,13, Sydney ...... Shaw’s Team...................... . 272 . 162 . 434 New South Wales .......... Won by 68 runs. 210 . 156 . 366 Dec. 14. Shaw’s Team .................. . 185 . — 185 1 j 1 16 of Cootamuudra.......... . 110 . — . 110 Won on first innings by 75 runs. Doc. 16,17,19,20 Shaw’s Team .............. 146 .. 193 .. 314 M elbourne.... Victoria.................................. 231.. 75 .. 326 Won by 18 runs. Dec. 23, 24,26 Shaws Team ......................2 3 3 .. — ..2 9 3 Adelaide.......... 15 of South Australia......... 24 4 .. 23a.. 272 1882. Drawn, a Two wickets down. Dec.81,Jan.2,3,4 Shaw’s Team.......................... 294 .. 808 .. 602 Melbourne___ Australia .............................. 320 .. 127a.. 447 Drawn, a Three wickets down. Jan. 12,13,14, Shaw’s Team ......................153 .. 4a.. 160 D unedin-----Eighteen of Otago ................ 8 4 .. 7 4 .. 158 Won by 10 wickets, a No wh-.ket down. Jan. 16,17, Shaw’s Team ........................ 146 .. — .. 146 Oimaru .......... Twenty-two of Oim aru____ 60 .. 57 .. 117 Won by an innings and 29 runs. Jan. 18, Shaw’s Team ............... 119 .. — .. 119 Timaru .......... Twenty-two ofTimaru ... . I ll .. — .. I ll Won on first innings by six wickets and 8 runs, a Four wick6ts down. Jan 23, 24. Shaw’s Team .............. 231 .. — .. 230 Christ Church Eighteen of Canterbury . .. . 103 .. 15a.. 115 Drawn, a Six wickets down. Jan. 25, 26, Shaw’s Team .............. 222 .. — .. 222 W ellington.... Twenty-two of Wellington 83 .. 5 4i.. 134 Drawn, a Ten wickets down. Jan. 31, Shaws Team .............. 84 .. — .. 84 Waikato ----- Twenty-two of Waikato___ 44 .. 53 .. 97 Won on the first innings by 40 runs. Feb. 2, 3,4, Shaw’s Team .....................214 .. 3 a .. 216 Auckland . .. . Twenty-two of Auckland .. 122 .. 94 .. 216 Won by ten wickets, a no wicket down. Feb. 14,15, Shaw’s Team .............. 119 .. 153 .. 272 Stanmore(N.S.W.)18 of Stanmore.................. 8 3 .. — .. 83 Drawn. Feb. 17,19, 20, Shaw’s Team ..................... 133 .. 232 .. 365 Sydney .......... Australia (11) ...................... 197 .. 170a.. 367 Lost by five wickets, a Five wickets down. Feb. 23, Shaw’s Team .................... 135a.. — .. 135 Windsor(N.S.W.) Twenty-two of Hawkesburv 51 .. — .. 61 Won on first innings by six wickets aud 74 runs, a Four Feb. 24, 25, 27, Shaw’sTeam ’ .......... 2 8 5 .. 57a.. S42 Melbourne----- Victoria (11) ............... 249 .. 92 .. 341 Won by eight wickets, a Two wickets down. MarchS, 4,6, Shaw’s Team .............. 188 .. 184 .. 822 Sydney .......... Australian Team for England (11)...................... 263 .. 66a ..326 Lost by six wickets, a four wickets down. . lo,11,13.14, Shaw’s Team ...................... 309 .. 284a.. 543 H ibourno....Australian Team .................... 300 ..— ..8 0 for England (11) Drawn, a Two wickets down. March 15,16. Shaw’s Team ....................... 141 .. — .... 141 Dim olly.......... Twenty-two of D uuolly----- 79 .. 49 .. 128 Won by an innings and 18 runs. March 17,18, Shaw’s Team ....................... 327 .. — .. 327 Ballarat.......... Twwnty of Ballarat .......... 141 .. 54a .. 195 Drawn, a Two wickets down. AVERAGES IN ALL MATCHES. BATTING AVERAGES. No. of Times Total Most Most Inns. not runs. iu an in a out. Inns. Match. Aver. Barlow, R. G. .. 46 . 6 .. 1068 . 77 . 98 . 26.28 Bates, W .......... 41 . 2 .. 1069 . 84 . 105 . 27.16 Emmett, T. .. .. 38 . 2 .. 837 . 39e. 39 . 9.13 Lillywliite, J. .. 3 . 2 14 . . 8a. 8 . . 14 Midwinter, W. .. 40 . 3 ” 658 . . 77 . 77 . 17.29 Peate, E. . .. .. 86 . 11 .. 185 . . 33c. 51 . 7.10 Pilling R.......... .. 38 . 15 .. 229 . . 23 . 35 . 9.22 Scotton, W. .. .. 89 . 2 .. 524 . 50a. 71 . 14.6 42 . 2 690 . . 70 . 126 . . 17.10 Shaw A............. .. 87 . . 4 362 . 43 . 45 . . 10.32 Shrewsbury A. .. 34 . 8 .. 810 . . 82 . 129 . . 26.4 Ulyett, G......... 46 . 3 .. 1424 . 167a. 213 . . 33.5 BOWLING AVERAGES. Inn. Overs. Maidens. Runs. Wickets. Aver Barlow R. G. 23 .. 280 .. 142 .. 350 .. 88 .. 9.8 Bates, W. .. 28 .. 738.1 .. 365 .. 915 .. 102 .. 8.99 Emmett, T. 21 .. 219.3 .. 145 .. 451 .. 40 .. 11.11 Midwinter, W. 34 .. 1006.1 .. 514 .. 1020 .. 192 .. 5.6 Peate, E.......... 44 .. 1382.2 .. 684 .. 1544 .. 264 .. 5.224 Shaw, A........... 25 .. 476 2 .. 291 .. 895 .. 78 5 5 Ulyett, G........ 19 .. 177.3 .. 60 .. 324 .. 15 .. 2L9 J. Selby bowled nineteen overs and two balls for 40 runs; W . Scotton, four overs for 12 rnns and one wicket; and A. Shrewsbur}', three overs for 15 runs. T he S urrey C hallenge Cop.—Two of the three matches in the first round of the third competition for the handsome Silver Cup presented by the Com­ mittee of the Surrey County Club will be decided to-day (Wednesday). Mitcham will play Cheam at Cheam, and Richmond Esher Village on Richmond Green. The match between Champion Hill and Farnham will be played on Tues­ day, 23rd inst. Farnham were the winners in 1880, but last year they were beaten in the Final by Cheam. O x f o r d M ilitary C ollege v . P em broke C o lleg e . Played at Cowley, May 3. Pembroke 146 (Mr. J. F. Kelcy, 49); Military, 51 for 5 wickets. (Oxon.) - ^ : C R I C K E T : / I T : 0 ^ K O ^ D t : < - FRESHMEN’S MATCH T h is m atch w as p la y e d a t O x ford on A p ril 28th an d 29th. O w ing to th e state o f th e grou n d th e ba ttin g w as n o t seen to advantage. F o r C ave’s side H ic k le y too k seven w ick ets fc r 64 r u n s ; Stew art 9 w ick ets fo r 41 runs. F o r O w en : B a s­ tard’ s 8 w ick ets co st 35 runs ; D u n ’s fo u r 11 ru n s ; G od frey’s fou r 20 runs, and H o rn b y ’s three 39 ru n s Mr. Owen’s Side. First Innings. Second Innings. Mr. W. E. Politho (H irrow and Trinity) c Turner b Hickley c Norton b Stewart .. 5 ......................................... 12 Mr. C. J. M. Godfrey (Magdalen and Hertford) c Newton b B y a s s .................................10 c Stainton b Stewart .. 20 Mr. C. P. Wilson (Rossall and Keble) b Stewart .. .. 29 c and b Asher .. .. 14 Mr. H.B.Tristram (Loretto aud Hertford) b Hickley.. .. 11 b Stewart ................0 Mr. W. N. Lea (Winchesterand Keble) b Hickley .. .. 6 bHiekley....................... 2 Mr. L. Owen (Charterhouse and New) b Stewart................... 0 rot out .. .. .. .. 26 Mr. C. H. Ruspell(Lancing anil Tmty.) c Newton b Hickley 3 c Kemps3n b Asher .. 19 Mr. E. Mahon (Marlbrough) c Stainton b Stewart 6 b B y a s s ...........................4 Mr. G. F. Hornby (Winchester) b S tew art..........................18 c Kempson b Byass .. 11 Mr. E. W. Bastard (Sherborne and Wadham) b Stewart 2 b B y a s s ...........................0 Mr. F. Dun (Loretto and Trinity) b Stewart .. .. 0 b Cave ........................... 3 Mr. C. Pickering (Shrewsbury &Univ.) not out .. .. 1 c Byass b Cave .. .. 1 . Byes 2 1-b 1 w 1 .. .. 4 B y es* l-b J fW **•I Total ..................102 Total.. .. I ll M r . C ave ’ s S ide . First Innings. Second Innings. Mr. E. H. Kempson (Rugby & Christ Church) c Russell b Pickering ............................0 b Bastard.................................8 Mr. D. E. Norton (Rugby and Keble) b Pickering .. .. 1 b Bastard.................................4 Mr. A. L. Stewart (Clifton and Unattached) c Mahon b Bastard ............................5 b Godfrey .........................5 Mr. W. Lea (Charterhouse and Keble) c Russell b Hornby 5 b Godfrey...............................10 Mr. A. Grant-Asher (Loretto and Brasenose) c Hornby b B a s ta rd ...........................5 c Hornby, b Bastard .. 9 Mr. H. W. Cave (Rugby and Balliol b Bastard .. 5 b Dun ................................. 9 Mr. A. B. Turner (Marlborough and Keble) run out .. .. 1 c Bastard b Dun .. ..1 7 Mr. N. E. W. Stainton (Win­ chester and Christ Church) b H o r n b y ........................... 1 c Dun b Bastard .. .. 8 Mr. A. E. Newton (Eton and Pembroke) cDun b Godfrey 18 c Tristram b Hornby .. 8 Mr. S. H. Byass (Radley and University) b Bastard .. 4 nob out .. .................. 1 Mr. C. L. Hickley (Winchester and Pembroke) not out .. 4 c Godfrey b Dun .. .. 0 M". M. G. Paine (Bradfield and Mirton) b Godfrey .. .. 3 st Tristram b D un.. .. 0 Byes I 1-b % 5 Byes t WHJ* w2 .. 7 I I — V - Total...................... 57 Total-.. ..- H ertford C ollege v . N ew C ollege .— Played at Hertford ground on Wednesday, May 3. Score Hertford, 81 and 32 (for three wickets); New, 77 L incoln C ollege , v . E xeter C ollege ,— Cowley, May 6. Lincoln 132 (W . C. Hawkins 37); Exeter 66 (F. J. Hill 24). L incoln v . S t . C atherine ’ s C lub .—Played at Cowley, May 3. St. Catherine’s, 31, and 39 for six wickets (Mr. J. J. Paterson not out, 22). Lin-' coin, 105 (Mr. A. H . Dickinson 61). C orpus C hristi v . Q ueen ’ s .— Played at Cowley, May 2. Corpus Christi, 97 (Mr. J. F. Hastings 35, and Mr. H. G. Hutchinson 28); Queen's 162 (Mr. A. B. Bucher, not out, 44, aud Mr. W. D. Ham­ ilton. not out, 10.9, without the lass of wicket). M. C. C. and G round v .. S u ssex . —The first im­ portant match of tho season will commence at Lord’ to-morrow ; the following will be the Mary, lebou.? eleven—-A. N. Hornby, G. F. Vernon, O. P Lancashire, J. Robertson, H. E. Rhodes, J. S’ Russel, aud G. S. Foljambe, with Barnes, Morley,- Woof, and Sherwin.