Cricket 1882

JUNE 29, 1882. CRICKET; A "WEEKLY RECORD OF THE GAME. i2ii R ichmond . J. Dtinn,bStokes .. ..121 i J. A. T. Johnson, b Honey6 A. Springett, c C. C. Parr, JJ. N. Bush, not out .. .. 8 b H o n e y .......................100 I B 8, 1-b 1, w 3, n b 3.. 15 E. D. Cecil, c Stokes, b i — Honey .. .. .. ..2 2 \ T o t a l ...................... 284 W. E. Martyn, c Stokes, b Honey .............................12 H. C. Phillips, F. B. Shadwell, E. A. James, A. R. Parker, and H. W. Cresswell did not bat. SOUTHALL v. VINE. Played at Southall on May 27. S outhall . First Innings. J. Abbott, b Mayo........................2 Wenel, b Mayo ........................8 Swift, b Hearsum........................0 Cowells, b H o a rsu m ...............16 Vincent, c Ilearsum, b Mayo .. 13 Rouse, run out ........................1 S. Abbott, b Mayo....................... 2 Pallister, b H earsu m ...............0 Claydon, not o u t .......................0 Brown, st Mayo, b Collett .. .. 0 Saunders, st Mayo, b Collett .. 4 B ........................................4 Total. 50 Second Innings. 1b w, b Collett .. .. 2 b G o d fr e y ...............0 st Mayo, b Collett .. 8 not out...................... 14 b G o d fre y ..................0 b Collett ..................0 b Collett ..................1 run out.. .; .. .. 1 b G o d fre y ..................3 b G o d fre y ..................1 absent..........................0 Total L ondon and C ounty B ank . J. Hearsum, run out .. 4 L. J.Reiegg, b Podmore.. 1 O. B. Doherty, c and b Podmore......................... 9 F. Rea, b Thomas .. .. 0 H. G. Hinds, b Welch .. 20 H. A. Young, c and b Welch . . . . . . . .. 28 F. H, Thirlwall, b Welch.. 7 H. Water, not out .. .. 3 B 3 ,1-b 2 .. .. .. 5 Total .. .. ,.> 77 G. Cecil, G. F. Pughe, and F. E. Steele did not bat. V^NE. Collett, b Sw ift..................10 DERBYSHIRE v. LANCASHIRE. This match, played at Derby on Monday and Tuesday, resulted in another defeat for the home county, Lancashire winning by an innings and 47 runs. Derbyshire had all the worst of the luck in losing the toss, and after the rain on Monday Watson and Crossland were almost unplayable. Mr. Hornby and Barlow made 102 for the first Lancashire wicket. L ancashire .. Hearsum, b Wenel Humphrey, b W enel.. Simmons, c Vincent, Swift.......................... Mayo, b Cowells Graham, b Cowells .. Godfrey, b Cowells .. 10 3 Burne, b S w ift..................0 Davie, not o u t ..................5 Stringer, run out .. .. 0 Hobbs, b Swift ..................2 B 3, w 2 ..................5 T o t a l ..................49 KENSINGTON PARK v. HAMPSTEAD. Played at Hampstead on Thursday, June 22. H ampstead . A. A. Brower, run out .. 22 R. Furber, b Campbell .. 0 A. J. Leach, b Campbell .. 0 R. W. D. Hill, c Mews, b Campbell..........................0 J. H. Walker, b Campbell 12 R. A. Walker, not out .. 2 E. E. Carey, c Comins, b Mews..................................3 B. Robson, c Thompson, b Campbell.......................... A. R. Parker, b Mews H. T. Smith, b Campbell.. A. Wyatt, b Mews .. .. B 1, 1-b 3 .................. T o t a l ..................51 K rnsington P ark . J. H. ( J. Gifford, not out .. 32 .. 1 E. O. Powell, b W a lk e r ..........................41 B l. G. Campbell, c J. H. — Walker, b Parker .. .. 3 I T o t a l ........ 77 W . F. Thompson, W. Mews, A. E.Ayers, W. J. Comins, H. Mews, J. Rixon, H. W. Price, and H. W.Iviallmark did not bat. PRIVATE BANKS v. FAIRFIELD. Played at Catford Bridge on June 12, 13, and 15, and won by Fairfield on first innings by 21 runs. P rivate B anks . W. B. Tyndall, b Cosens .. 1 A. M. Inglis, c Brierly, b Ledger ..........................52 K. D. Coffin, b Cosens .. 0 W. H. B. Godfrey,b Cosens 35 D. C. Johnson, c Brierly, b Barry..................................23 C. A. Neilson, retired .. 15 C. H. M. Thring, b Cosens 13 F airfield . Mr. A. N. Hornby, c Smith, Mr. W. E. Openshaw, b b Mycroft .................. 79 Richards"n .................. 3 Barlow, c Smith, b RichBriggs, c Mycroft, b Rich­ ardson .......................... 38 ardson .......................... 1 Mr. E. Roper, c Foster, b Watson, not out .. .. Crossland, b Platts .. 14 Slater .......................... 1 24 Robinson, retired hurt .. 10 Nash, c Smith, b Platts .. 8 Mr. 0. P. Lancashire, b B 2 ,1-b 2 .................. 4 M y cro ft.......................... 1 — Pilling, c Cropper, b My- T o t a l .................. 179 1 D erbysh ire . First Innings. Mr. H. E. Sugden, b Watson .. Mr. R. P. Smith, b Crossland .. Platts, b Crossland .................. Mr. E. A. J. Maynard, b Cross­ land .......................................... Cropper, .b Crossland.................. Foster, run out .. .................. Slater, b Crossland .................. Chatterton, run ou . .................. Richardson, c.Nasb, b W atson.. Disney, not out .......................... Mycroft, b Watson .................. B 2 ,1-b 1 .................................. Second Innings. 0 b Crossland.. 2 b W a ts o n .................. 5 st Pilling, b Watson . 0 not out. 0. 52 0 11 4 0 0 .. 77 .. ..2 8 b W a ts o n ..................0 b W a ts o n .................. run.out..........................0 b Crossland.................2 b Crossland..................2 b W a ts o n .................. b Crossland..................0 B l, 1-bl .. .. 0 Total .. ..5 5 Chatterton Slater Mycroft ANALYSES OF BOWLING. L ancashire . O. M .R.W . O.M .R.W . 9 2 24 0 Platts.................. 9.2 2 16 2 . 3013 35 1 Richardson .. 21 7 43 3 . 3919 46 3 Cropper . . . . 4 1 11 0 S. A. Ponsonby, b Barry.. A. Bowden-Smith, c Moore, b B a r r y .......................... W. Coppinger, not out .. 3 R. E. Mills, b Cosens .. 4 B 3 ,1-b 2, w l .. .. 6 Total F. W. Ledger, b Godfrey .. 2 F. H. Moore, b Bowden- Smith ..........................24 G. Cosens, b Bowden- Smith ..........................3 F. Barry, b Johnson .. .. 81 W. H. Brierly, b Thring . 5 W. B. Robertson, c Inglis, b Godfroy..........................16 C. A. Stein, c Neilson, b G odfrey......................... H. G.Chapman,b Johnson H. J. Gibson, run out .. W. Bloek, b Inglis .. C. H. HurndaU, not out B 13, w 3 .................. T o ta l..................179 LONDON AND COUNTY BANK v. LONDON AND WESTMINSTER BANK. Played at the Oval on Monday and Tuesday, 12th and 13th June. L ondon and W estminster B ank . II. Woyestan, b Youug .. 4 Welch, b Jlcarsum .. .. 0 Thomas, b Hearsum .. 4 Daviw, b Hearsum .. .. 0 H. lligg, b Hearsum .. 8 A. Podmore, b Hearsum 0 T-W.Mackintosh,b Young 7 l'ranklin, c sub., b Heard- suna . . . . 0 W. Anderson, not out .. 1 H. Squire, st Hearsura, b Young ..........................3 Watson, st Hearsum, b Young ...........................0 B 2 ...........................2 Total - i D erbyshire . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R.W. O. M. R.W. Watson .. .. 40 25 2S3 ............................. 21 11 80 5 Crossland.. .. 81 18 32 5 .. .................. 21 12 28 4 Barlow .. .. 9 4 16 0 OXFORD v. CAMBRIDGE, The forty-eighth Inter-Universitymatch ended yes­ terday at Lord’s in a victory for Cambridge. At the commencement of the season it was thought that the Light Blues would have no chance; but Oxford did not maintain their form of the early part of the year, and the better performance of the Cantabs against the Marylebone •Club and Ground properly made them favourites. Oxford gained the advantage of first innings, but despite the rain on the first day, the wicket played well throughout. Oxford, thanks to Mr. Shaw, began with a creditable score of 105, but their bowling was not good enough to dismiss Cambridge for a lesser number, with the ground in anything, like run- getting order, and the Cantabs ,were helped by more than one mistake in the field. Mr. G. B. Studd had some luck in his 120, but his hitting was very clean and well-timed, and altogether lie is to be congratulated on his innings of three figures—a rare feat in Inter - University matches. Mr. Henery, who filled the eleventh place in the team, justified his position by a useful 61, in which he showed some good hitting. It hardly looked on the second night as if Oxford would head their previous score ; but Mr. Kemp, the wicket-keeper, came to the rescue with a very well-got innings of 82, and this made, the game again interesting. When Cambridge went in with i f ; 148 to win, there was some slight chance of a cl finish, but the bowling of Oxford was so plain t. the runs came quickly. The two fast bowl* Peake and Robinson, were kept on unchanged ur nearly all the runs had been got—peculiar polii considering how the score rose. Mr. C. T. Stujl" J, after the first, few overs, played in his best for*' and everyone will be glad to find him once nl■" in luck. Mr. Lacey, too, batted in good free stj and, indeed, his form was as good as any in match. Cambridge won easily by seven wickc and won on their merits. Ramsay was a compli failure as a bowler on this occasion, as his wickets cost 91 runs, while C. T. Studd’s ni realised 100 runs. As we predicted, the Oxford bov, ing proved to be very moderate, and all rou i Cambridge were decidedly the better eleven. Tlij| have won 24 matches, Oxford 22, and two have be | drawn. Mr. G. B. Studd’s 120 is the highest sco| in the Inter-University match, with the exceptii of Mr. Yardley’s 130 for Cambridge in 1872. il !;■ O xford . First Innings. E. D. Shaw, st Wright, b Ramsay (53 A. O; W'hiting, b C. T. Studd .. 8 C. F. H. Leslie, c Gaddum, b S m ith ..........................................6 J. G. Walker, b Sm ith..................0 W. A. Thornton, c Gaddum, b C. S tu d d ......................................... 26 M. C. Kemp, c and b C. T. Studd 4 E. Peake, b C. T. Studd .. .. 27 W. D. D. Hamilton, c Paravicini, b C. Studd.................................. 9 N. M‘Lachlan, c Ramsay, b C. T. S tu d d ..........................................2 J. Patterson, not o u t ..................8 G. E. Robinson, b C. T. Studd .. 2 B 8, 1-b 2 ..................................10 Second Innings, st Wright, b Ramsay #• run out .. .. • b Smith run out.. 3i 1b w, b Gaddum c and b Gaddum A24 b Lacey .. .. run out........................... 0 b C. T. Studd .. . b C. T. Studd .. . .J not out............................ ' B 1 0 ,1-b 11, w 1.44 Total..................................165 Total .. Second Innings. C ambridge . First Innings. G. B. Studd, c Hamilton, b P ea k e............................................120 J. E. K. Studd, b Peake .. ..1 4 b Peake ................... Hon. M. B. Hawke, c Whiting, b P a tterson..................................... 15 c M'Lachlan, b Peake F. E. Lacey, e M‘Lachlan, b Poake ......................................... C. T. Studd, c Whiting, b Robin­ son ...............................................0 C. W. Wright, b Robinson.. .. 17 R. C. Ramsay, b Peake .. .. 8 P. J. T. Henery, 1b w, b Thornton 61 P. J. de Paravicini, not out .. 9 C. A. Smith, c Kempe, b Poake.. 14 F. D. Gaddum, run out .. .. 0 B 8, 1-b 3 ..................................... 11 fi not out. c Kemp ,b Shaw not out................. Si 3( 3£ 6t, t Total.. Total ..148 ANALYSES OF BOWLING. C ambridge . First Iunings. Second Innings. O. M. R.W. O. M. R.W. Robinson .. .. 39 14 60 2 .......................... 25 8 45 0 Peake............... 42 12 815 ............................ 23 9 66 2 S haw ............... 29 11 470 ............................ 13.3 5 21 1 Patterson .. .. 17 5 31 1 M‘Lachlan.. .. 9 0 24 0 Thornton . . . . 7 1 211 ............................. 4 0 12 0 O xford . First Innings. Second Innings. O. M. R.W. O. M. R .W . C. Studd . . . . 69 37 547 ............................. 72 48 46 2 Ramsay .. .. 29 11 441 ............................. 23 14 47 1 Gaddum .. .. 6 1 150 ............................. 24.1 8 35 2 Sm ith.................. 25 13 232 ............................. 32 12 45 1 Paravicini .. .. 11 3 190 ..................... ..... 10 4 19 0 Lacey .. .. 13 5 32 1 AUSTRALIANS v. UNITED ELEVEN. This match, which had been advertised locally as Australians v. England, was finished at the Priory Park Ground, Chichester, yesterday. Tho United team was not only one short but was utterly inca­ pable of giving the Australians anything like a trial, either in batting or bowling, and the result was a somewhat inglorious defeat by an innings and 263 runs. The Australians were in until nearly the close of the second afternoon for 501, and Banner­ man was at the wickets all the first day, for 76 not out. Head, of Surrey, played fine cricket each time, but otherwise the Colonial bowlers had things very much their own way, and in the second innings four of the United made 49 out of (57 from the bat.